These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10930484)

  • 21. Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?
    Pickuth D; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Spielmann RP
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10817330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in children.
    Partrick DA; Janik JE; Janik JS; Bensard DD; Karrer FM
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 May; 38(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 12720164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.
    Stephen AE; Segev DL; Ryan DP; Mullins ME; Kim SH; Schnitzer JJ; Doody DP
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Mar; 38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. PubMed ID: 12632351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When should we order a CT scan and when should we rely on the results to diagnose an acute appendicitis?
    Ceydeli A; Lavotshkin S; Yu J; Wise L
    Curr Surg; 2006; 63(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 17084779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of ultrasound on clinical decision making in acute appendicitis: a prospective study.
    Zielke A; Hasse C; Sitter H; Rothmund M
    Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 9562281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.
    van Breda Vriesman AC; Kole BJ; Puylaert JB
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2278-82. PubMed ID: 12845461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of equivocal acute appendicitis. A meta-analysis.
    Al-Khayal KA; Al-Omran MA
    Saudi Med J; 2007 Feb; 28(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 17268692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A highly sensitive and specific combined clinical and sonographic score to diagnose appendicitis.
    Reddy SB; Kelleher M; Bokhari SAJ; Davis KA; Schuster KM
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2017 Oct; 83(4):643-649. PubMed ID: 28459797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Value of ultrasound and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with histopathology as gold standard.
    Haentjens L; Coussement L; Vuylsteke M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2023 Dec; 123(6):654-658. PubMed ID: 36250679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic value of laparoscopy, abdominal computed tomography, and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis.
    Bachar I; Perry ZH; Dukhno L; Mizrahi S; Kirshtein B
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Dec; 23(12):982-9. PubMed ID: 24134071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The Relevance of Surgeon-performed Ultrasound For the Detection of Acute Appendicitis: a Review of the Literature and a Practical Diagnostic Algorithm].
    Beltzer CR; Zischek C; Schmidt R; Friemert B; Achatz G; Palm HG
    Zentralbl Chir; 2017 Aug; 142(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 28838020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis.
    Hershko DD; Sroka G; Bahouth H; Ghersin E; Mahajna A; Krausz MM
    Am Surg; 2002 Nov; 68(11):1003-7. PubMed ID: 12455796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline.
    Smink DS; Finkelstein JA; Garcia Peña BM; Shannon MW; Taylor GA; Fishman SJ
    J Pediatr Surg; 2004 Mar; 39(3):458-63; discussion 458-63. PubMed ID: 15017570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of a computed tomography scan to rule out appendicitis in women of childbearing age is as accurate as clinical examination: a prospective randomized trial.
    Lopez PP; Cohn SM; Popkin CA; Jackowski J; Michalek JE;
    Am Surg; 2007 Dec; 73(12):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18186378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasonography and computed tomography in a clinical algorithm for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in children.
    Teo EL; Tan KP; Lam SL; Ong CL; Wong CS
    Singapore Med J; 2000 Aug; 41(8):387-92. PubMed ID: 11256346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Negative appendicectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and Alvarado score.
    Kundiona I; Chihaka OB; Muguti GI
    Cent Afr J Med; 2015; 61(9-12):66-73. PubMed ID: 29144064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic pathways in acute appendicitis: Clinical score plus ultrasound outperform CT scan or upfront surgery, especially in doubtful cases.
    Coccolini F; Martinez-Perez A; Licitra G; De Angelis N; Cremonini C; Strambi S; Zocco G; Puglisi A; Tartaglia D; Chiarugi M
    World J Surg; 2024 Jun; 48(6):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 38549035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acute appendicitis - new diagnostic algorithm using RIPASA score and non-contrast Computeed Tomography Scan.
    Davis GN; Swaminathan M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(Suppl 1)(1):S12-S16. PubMed ID: 30697011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography.
    Stewart JK; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Oct; 40(8):455-61. PubMed ID: 22638942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of body mass index on the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in diagnosing appendicitis in children.
    Abo A; Shannon M; Taylor G; Bachur R
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2011 Aug; 27(8):731-6. PubMed ID: 21811194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.