BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10931513)

  • 1. An approximate unconditional test of non-inferiority between two proportions.
    Kang SH; Chen JJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Aug; 19(16):2089-100. PubMed ID: 10931513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact tests of equivalence and efficacy with a non-zero lower bound for comparative studies.
    Chan IS
    Stat Med; 1998 Jun; 17(12):1403-13. PubMed ID: 9682328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exact unconditional tests for testing non-inferiority in matched-pairs design.
    Sidik K
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 12520561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power and sample size determination for noninferiority trials using an exact method.
    Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 12477069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unconditional exact tests for equivalence or noninferiority for paired binary endpoints.
    Hsueh HM; Liu JP; Chen JJ
    Biometrics; 2001 Jun; 57(2):478-83. PubMed ID: 11414572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing two independent incidence rates using conditional and unconditional exact tests.
    Han C
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17506083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests for the homogeneity of two binomial proportions in extremely unbalanced 2 x 2 contingency tables.
    Kang SH; Ahn CW
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2524-35. PubMed ID: 17847031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cautionary note on exact unconditional inference for a difference between two independent binomial proportions.
    Mehrotra DV; Chan IS; Berger RL
    Biometrics; 2003 Jun; 59(2):441-50. PubMed ID: 12926729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Unconditional Test for Change Point Detection in Binary Sequences with Applications to Clinical Registries.
    Ellenberger D; Friede T
    Methods Inf Med; 2016 Aug; 55(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 27406195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing non-inferiority of a new treatment in three-arm clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Tang NS; Yu B; Tang ML
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():134. PubMed ID: 25524326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quasi-exact method for the confidence intervals of the difference of two independent binomial proportions in small sample cases.
    Chen X
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(6):943-56. PubMed ID: 11870826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.
    Berger RL; Sidik K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Mar; 12(2):91-108. PubMed ID: 12665205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active-control trials with binary data: a comparison of methods for testing superiority or non-inferiority using the odds ratio.
    Siqueira AL; Whitehead A; Todd S
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):353-70. PubMed ID: 17628041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence interval construction for proportion difference in small-sample paired studies.
    Tang ML; Tang NS; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3565-79. PubMed ID: 16261646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():91. PubMed ID: 23848987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-tailed asymptotic inferences for the difference of proportions: Analysis of 97 methods of inference.
    Hernández MÁ; Andrés AM; Tejedor IH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 29608389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The special case of the 2 × 2 table: asymptotic unconditional McNemar test can be used to estimate sample size even for analysis based on GEE.
    Borkhoff CM; Johnston PR; Stephens D; Atenafu E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):733-9. PubMed ID: 25510372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the non-unity of rate ratio under inverse sampling.
    Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK; Chan PS
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):551-64. PubMed ID: 17621387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unconditional efficient one-sided confidence limits for the odds ratio based on conditional likelihood.
    Lloyd CJ; Moldovan MV
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5136-46. PubMed ID: 17437251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.