135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10932429)
1. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments.
Hailey D; Corabian P; Harstall C; Schneider W
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(2):651-6. PubMed ID: 10932429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of technology assessments by advisory bodies on health policy and practice.
Hailey DM
Health Policy; 1993 Oct; 25(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 10129768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health technology assessment.
Hailey D
Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Providing information on emerging health technologies to provincial decision makers: a pilot project.
Hailey D; Topfer LA; Wills F
Health Policy; 2001 Oct; 58(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 11518599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution.
Hailey DM
Med J Aust; 2007 Sep; 187(5):286-8. PubMed ID: 17767434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of exploratory analyses within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal process: an evaluation and qualitative analysis.
Kaltenthaler E; Carroll C; Hill-McManus D; Scope A; Holmes M; Rice S; Rose M; Tappenden P; Woolacott N
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Apr; 20(26):1-48. PubMed ID: 27049841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health technology assessment in Canada. A decade in review.
Menon D; Topfer LA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(3):896-902. PubMed ID: 11028144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current status of economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community: report of the network. The EC Network on the Methodology of Economic Appraisal of Health Technology.
Davies L; Coyle D; Drummond M
Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1601-7. PubMed ID: 8047917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elements for assessment of telemedicine applications.
Ohinmaa A; Hailey D; Roine R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(2):190-202. PubMed ID: 11446131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON HOSPITAL DECISION MAKERS - 10-YEAR INSIGHT FROM A HOSPITAL UNIT IN SHERBROOKE, CANADA: IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ON HOSPITAL DECISIONS.
Poder TG; Bellemare CA; Bédard SK; Fisette JF; Dagenais P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(4):393-399. PubMed ID: 30021663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Type and Impact of Evidence Review Group Exploratory Analyses in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process.
Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E; Hill-McManus D; Scope A; Holmes M; Rice S; Rose M; Tappenden P; Woolacott N
Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):785-791. PubMed ID: 28577696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments.
Hailey D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):415-8. PubMed ID: 19619362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-coverage assessments of new hospital interventions on Austria: methodology and 3 years of experience.
Mad P; Geiger-Gritsch S; Hinterreiter G; Mathis-Edenhofer S; Wild C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Apr; 28(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 22559761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What decision-makers want and what they have been getting.
McGregor M
Value Health; 2006; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 16689712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.
Andronis L; Barton P; Bryan S
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. PubMed ID: 19500484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors influencing coverage decisions on medical devices: A retrospective analysis of 78 medical device appraisals for the Austrian hospital benefit catalogue 2008-2015.
Kisser A; Tüchler H; Erdös J; Wild C
Health Policy; 2016 Aug; 120(8):903-12. PubMed ID: 27344197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experiences with and impact of health technology assessment on the German Standing Committee of physicians and patients].
Gibis B; Rheinberger P
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Feb; 96(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 11921610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies for successful evaluation and policy-making toward health care technology on the move: the case of medical lasers.
Banta HD; Vondeling H
Soc Sci Med; 1994 Jun; 38(12):1663-74. PubMed ID: 8047925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
