These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10932431)

  • 1. Identifying studies for systematic reviews. An example from medical imaging.
    Berry E; Kelly S; Hutton J; Harris KM; Smith MA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2000; 16(2):668-72. PubMed ID: 10932431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study.
    Sampson M; Barrowman NJ; Moher D; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Morrison A; Klassen TP; Zhang L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Feb; 6():7. PubMed ID: 16504110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
    Shojania KG; Bero LA
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; de Bruijn B; Urquhart C; Shojania K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():108-115. PubMed ID: 26976054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Searching literature databases for health care economic evaluations: how systematic can we afford to be?
    Sassi F; Archard L; McDaid D
    Med Care; 2002 May; 40(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 11961473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7482):68. PubMed ID: 15619601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.
    Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19712212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews.
    Golder S; Loke YK; Zorzela L
    Health Info Libr J; 2014 Jun; 31(2):92-105. PubMed ID: 24754741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
    Major MP; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 16946429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy.
    Lunny C; McKenzie JE; McDonald S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():107-18. PubMed ID: 26723872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
    Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
    Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).
    Flores-Mir C; Major MP; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16905066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparison of search strategies for systematic reviews: an objective approach yielded higher sensitivity than a conceptual one.
    Hausner E; Guddat C; Hermanns T; Lampert U; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():118-124. PubMed ID: 27256930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Yoshii A; Plaut DA; McGraw KA; Anderson MJ; Wellik KE
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2009 Jan; 97(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 19158999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.
    Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Search methods for prognostic factor systematic reviews: a methodologic investigation.
    Boulos L; Ogilvie R; Hayden JA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Jan; 109(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 33424461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.