116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10932633)
1. See you in court?
Moran T
Tex Med; 1999 Mar; 95(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 10932633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The great compromise. Republicans begin to accept health plan liability, but they want it only on their terms.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 2000 Aug; 30(34):44. PubMed ID: 11185164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Managed care under siege. Despite some legal victories, HMOs face other battles in fighting right-to-sue lawsuits.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2000 Jul; 30(28):34, 39. PubMed ID: 11184158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient's rights versus legislative wrongs: a health plan executive's perspective.
Berman H
Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):70, 78. PubMed ID: 11155648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HMO liability: how will it affect physicians? Come on in! The water fine!
Diamond F
Manag Care; 1999 Mar; 8(3):24-6, 28-9, 33-7. PubMed ID: 10351599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is your HMO too stingy?
Pedersen D
Newsweek; 1999 Jul; 134(4):56. PubMed ID: 10539442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Supreme Court rules HMO suits are preempted.
Prieto-Gonzalez M
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):774-6. PubMed ID: 15807366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. House passes "patient protection" legislation.
Hosp Outlook; 2001 Aug; 4(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11550596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoiding 'bad faith' denials of medical claims.
Quinn C
Manag Care; 1997 Apr; 6(4):79-80, 83-5. PubMed ID: 10167004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Texas Health Care Liability Act: Texas is the first state to listen to the concerns of its health care consumers, but how much has it heard?
McCabe KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):565-95. PubMed ID: 10970185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Texas ruling another victory for HMOs.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 2000 Sep; 30(40):24-5. PubMed ID: 11186645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Will prudent layperson please report to the ER'.
Heimoff S
Manag Care; 1999 May; 8(5):43-6, 49. PubMed ID: 10538054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consumers' choice.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2004 Mar; 100(3):37-9. PubMed ID: 15146762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dangerous liaisons.
Borger G
US News World Rep; 1998 Aug; 125(5):24. PubMed ID: 10182084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tough act to follow.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 1998 Nov; 94(11):78-83. PubMed ID: 9828688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A review of Maryland insurance law.
Littman B
Md Med; 2001; 2(2):29-42. PubMed ID: 11398493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. HMO finger-pointing abounds after defeat.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1999 Oct; 29(42):8, 10. PubMed ID: 10623234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The battle continues. Congress still wrestling with competing patients' rights bills.
Ortolon K
Tex Med; 2001 Jul; 97(7):30-3. PubMed ID: 11481793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Mandatory POS (point-of-service). Idaho law forces HMOs to pay for non-network care.
Shinkman R
Mod Healthc; 1997 Jun; 27(24):14. PubMed ID: 10168232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Turning up the heat on managed care.
Ziegler J
State Health Care Am; 1996; ():33-5. PubMed ID: 10539284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
