These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10933556)

  • 1. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2000 Jun; 58(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 10933556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Apr; 62(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 15198387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Int Dent J; 2000 Dec; 50(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 11197194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Jan; 55(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 9083578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE
    J Am Coll Dent; 1998; 65(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 9805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth.
    Mjör IA; Dahl JE; Moorhead JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2002 Jan; 60(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11902609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.
    Forss H; Widström E
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2001 Apr; 59(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 11370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restorative service patterns in Australia: amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer restorations.
    Brennan DS; Spencer AJ
    Int Dent J; 2003 Dec; 53(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 14725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Funkhouser E; Fellows JL; Shamp DG; Qvist V; Meral JS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 144(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 23729455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report.
    Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 9063229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Cheung SW; Mjör IA
    Br Dent J; 2002 Jun; 192(12):699-702. PubMed ID: 12125795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.