These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10934604)

  • 1. [An investigation of factors associated with failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
    Kageyama S; Hirai S; Higashi Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2000 Jun; 46(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 10934604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: I. A critical review of 121 extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy failures.
    Grasso M; Loisides P; Beaghler M; Bagley D
    Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 7879329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?
    El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Sheir KZ
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2059-62; discussion 2062. PubMed ID: 17070256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.
    Abdel-Khalek M; Sheir K; Elsobky E; Showkey S; Kenawy M
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 14594691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical results of transurethral ureterolithotripsy using pulsed-dye laser: primary ureteral stones versus secondary ureteral stones after ESWL].
    Tanaka M; Yamaguchi K; Takeuchi T; Nishimura Y; Tominaga T
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1998 Dec; 44(12):857-60. PubMed ID: 10028429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of hydronephrosis on treatment outcome of solitary proximal ureteral stone after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Hsiao HL; Huang SP; Wu WJ; Lee YC; Li WM; Chou YH; Chang AW; Huang CH; Sun SC; Liu CC
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Oct; 24(10):507-13. PubMed ID: 19181581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zomorrodi A; Golivandan J; Samady J
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 May; 19(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 18445899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi in colic versus noncolic patients.
    Seitz C; Tanovic E; Kikic Z; Memarsadeghi M; Fajkovic H
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1223-7. PubMed ID: 17321666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
    Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.
    Nikoobakht MR; Emamzadeh A; Abedi AR; Moradi K; Mehrsai A
    Urol J; 2007; 4(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18270943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Treatment of middle and lower ureteral stones with ESWL: evaluation of the results of 190 solitary stones in comparison with those of upper ureteral stones].
    Inaba Y; Okamoto M; Harada M
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1995 Mar; 41(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 7741069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].
    Lamotte F; Izadifar V; Fontaine E; Barthélémy Y; Beurton D
    Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10785914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
    Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Piezoelectric, electrohydraulic and electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stone].
    Sun X; Chen C; Wang Y; Yu H
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 37(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 11829829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].
    Halachmi S; Goldin O; Gleizarov E; Kaufman Z; Ginesin Y; Meretyk S
    Harefuah; 2005 Sep; 144(9):605-8, 680, 679. PubMed ID: 16218527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Solo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of upper ureteral calculi with hydronephrosis.
    Wadhera S; Mathur RK; Odiya S; Raikwar RS; Girish G
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 18592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.
    Mogensen P; Andersen JT
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1994; 157():159-63. PubMed ID: 7939448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.