BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10934951)

  • 1. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
    Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
    Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL on Pap smear reports: management by repeat Pap smear, HPV DNA testing, or colposcopy?
    Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Borgatta L; Buck H; Kramer L; Rubin R
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 9487318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA testing and repeat Papanicolaou test in women with low-grade cervical cytologic abnormalities: a randomized trial. HPV Effectiveness in Lowgrade Paps (HELP) Study No. 1 Group.
    Lytwyn A; Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Daya D; Chapman W; Ellis N; Roth P; Lorincz AT; Gafni A
    CMAJ; 2000 Sep; 163(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 11022584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in Papanicolaou smears.
    Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 46(9):799-805. PubMed ID: 11584480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
    Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CIN 2/3 and cervical cancer after an ASCUS pap smear. A 7-year, prospective study of the Norwegian population-based, coordinated screening program.
    Nygård JF; Sauer T; Skjeldestad FE; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(6):991-1000. PubMed ID: 14674068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions?
    Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
    Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
    Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical implication of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with or without favoring high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smears.
    ChangChien CC; Lin H; Eng HL; Chang WK
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Dec; 22(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 10695204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical neoplasia after diagnosis and follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Murta EF; Da Silva CS; Vieira JB; Khabbaz KM; Adad SJ
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2007; 34(4):219-22. PubMed ID: 18225682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
    Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
    Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervicography combined with repeat Papanicolaou test as triage for low-grade cytologic abnormalities.
    Eskridge C; Begneaud WP; Landwehr C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 92(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 9721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
    Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.