82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10934954)
21. The diagnostic value of computer-assisted primary cervical smear screening: a longitudinal cohort study.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; Habbema JD; van den Tweel JG
Mod Pathol; 1999 Nov; 12(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 10574595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. PAPNET Testing System. Technical update.
Denaro TJ; Herriman JM; Shapira O
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9022728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical validation of interactive cytologic screening. Automating the search, not the interpretation.
Mango LJ
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 9022733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-assisted primary screening of cervical smears using the PAPNET method: comparison with conventional screening and evaluation of the role of the cytologist.
Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME; Beck S
Cytopathology; 1994 Aug; 5(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 7948757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of PAPNET-assisted cervical rescreening.
Doornewaard H; Woudt JM; Strubbe P; van de Seijp H; van den Tweel JG
Cytopathology; 1997 Oct; 8(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 9313983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective and randomised public-health trial on neural network-assisted screening for cervical cancer in Finland: results of the first year.
Nieminen P; Hakama M; Viikki M; Tarkkanen J; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2003 Jan; 103(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 12471627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficiency of PAPNET in detecting infectious organisms in cervicovaginal smears.
Ashfaq R; Thomas S; Saboorian MH
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(5):885-8. PubMed ID: 8842161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated cervical cytology: meta-analyses of the performance of the PAPNET system.
Abulafia O; Sherer DM
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1999 Apr; 54(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 10198930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated sputum screening with PAPNET system: a study of 122 cases.
Hoda RS; Saccomanno G; Schreiber K; Decker D; Koss LG
Hum Pathol; 1996 Jul; 27(7):656-9. PubMed ID: 8698308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evaluation of PAPNET--a semiautomated system used in the screening against cervical cancer].
Hølund B; Ejersbo D; Hjortebjerg A
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5802-6. PubMed ID: 9782761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. PAPNET-assisted primary screening of conventional cervical smears.
Cenci M; Nagar C; Vecchione A
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3887-9. PubMed ID: 11268471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A randomized crossover trial of PAPNET for primary cervical screening.
Irwig L; Macaskill P; Farnsworth A; Wright RG; McCool J; Barratt A; Simpson JM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 57(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 15019013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the PAPNET system for prescreening triage of cervicovaginal smears.
Ashfaq R; Saliger F; Solares B; Thomas S; Liu G; Liang Y; Saboorian MH
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 9250299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. LEYTAS analysis of cytological specimens: the results of thousand cervical smears.
Goyarts-Veldstra L; van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; Meyer F; Ploem JS
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():147-60. PubMed ID: 6578401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. PAPNET. The human and other dimensions.
Husain OA; Kocjan G; Butler EB; McGloin JE
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(5):1439-44. PubMed ID: 9305381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears after earlier smears with atypical squamous cells.
Ridgley R; Hernandez E; Cruz C; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 3361519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Switching from neural networks (PAPNET) to the Imager (Hologic) for computer-assisted screening.
Boon ME; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Meijer-Marres EM; Bontekoe TR
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 21325801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
