65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10934956)
1. Screening parameters for ThinPrep and conventional gynecologic cytology via automated monitoring.
Hoerl HD; Shalkham JE; Cheung K; Hurlbert SD; Inhorn SL; Kurtycz DF
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):618-24. PubMed ID: 10934956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the Pathfinder system to reduce missed abnormal cervical cytologic smear cases in a rescreening program.
Berger BM
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 9022741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the Pathfinder in a cytology laboratory.
Coggi G; Bulfamante G; Romeo M; Falleni M; Aldovini A; Cirillo G; Federico D; Roncalli M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 9022740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in a gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait.
Luthra UK; Chishti M; Dey P; Jolly SV; Abdulla M; Das DK; Sugathan TN; Ajrawi MT; George J; George SS; Aziz AA; al-Juwaiser A; Karim FA; Mallik MK; Sheikh ZA; Khan S
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 11917577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One hundred percent thorough quality control rescreening of liquid-based monolayers in cervicovaginal cytopathology.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Bentz JS
Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 12478679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter direct to vial evaluation of a liquid-based pap test.
Hatch KD; Sheets E; Kennedy A; Ferris DG; Darragh T; Twiggs L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Oct; 8(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 15874878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated screening of gynecologic cytology: a comparison of results.
Alameda F; Pijuan L; Lloveras B; Soler I; Romero E; Carreras R; Serrano S
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2011 Feb; 33(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 22125843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical quality assurance in cytology. Use of the Pathfinder to continuously assess screener process control in real time.
Berger BM
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 8604582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ThinPrep preparations with conventional cervicovaginal smears. Practical considerations.
Bur M; Knowles K; Pekow P; Corral O; Donovan J
Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(4):631-42. PubMed ID: 7631535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions.
Islam S; West AM; Saboorian MH; Ashfaq R
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 15098249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glandular lesions of the cervix on thin-layer Pap tests. Validity of cytologic criteria used in identifying significant lesions.
Ozkan F; Ramzy I; Mody DR
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(3):372-9. PubMed ID: 15192953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer cytology with colposcopic biopsy control in central Italy: a consecutive sampling study of 461 cases.
Rahimi S; Carnovale-Scalzo C; Marani C; Renzi C; Malvasi A; Votano S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Jan; 37(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18973131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A more accurate measure of the false-negative rate of Papanicolaou smear screening is obtained by determining the false-negative rate of the rescreening process.
Renshaw AA; DiNisco SA; Minter LJ; Cibas ES
Cancer; 1997 Oct; 81(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 9349513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The human false-negative rate of rescreening Pap tests. Measured in a two-arm prospective clinical trial.
Renshaw AA; Lezon KM; Wilbur DC
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 11309775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of atypia in conventional Papanicolaou smears and liquid-based cytology: a follow-up study.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Cytopathology; 2004 Jun; 15(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 15165271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material.
Dey P; Luthra UK; George J; Zuhairy F; George SS; Haji BI
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10667159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a CompuCyte Pathfinder to evaluate cytotechnology student diagnostic performance.
Hawthorne C; Greening SE; Grassia R; Tiesi C; Weidmann J; Bibbo M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 9022739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Salivary gland fine needle aspiration using the ThinPrep technique: diagnostic accuracy, cytologic artifacts and pitfalls.
Al-Khafaji BM; Afify AM
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):567-74. PubMed ID: 11480720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
