195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10936797)
1. Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring.
Canaud B; Bosc JY; Cabrol L; Leray-Moragues H; Navino C; Verzetti G; Thomaseth K
Kidney Int Suppl; 2000 Aug; 76():S28-40. PubMed ID: 10936797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adequacy in hemodialysis: new concepts derived from online urea monitoring.
Arrigo G; Beltrame A; Colasanti G
Kidney Int Suppl; 2000 Aug; 76():S41-6. PubMed ID: 10936798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Eliminating the need for routine monthly postdialysis serum urea nitrogen measurement: A method for monitoring Kt/V and normalized protein catabolic rate using conductivity determined dialyzer clearance.
Daugirdas JT
Semin Dial; 2018 Nov; 31(6):633-636. PubMed ID: 30311270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rebound kinetics of beta2-microglobulin after hemodialysis.
Leypoldt JK; Cheung AK; Deeter RB
Kidney Int; 1999 Oct; 56(4):1571-7. PubMed ID: 10504510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Creatinine generation from kinetic modeling with or without postdialysis serum creatinine measurement: results from the HEMO study.
Daugirdas JT; Depner TA
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2017 Nov; 32(11):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 28379486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of postdialysis urea rebound on the quantification of pediatric hemodialysis.
Marsenić O; Pavlicić D; Bigović G; Peco-Antić A; Jovanović O
Nephron; 2000 Feb; 84(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 10657712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine Kt/V and Normalized Protein Nitrogen Appearance Rate Determined From Conductivity Access Clearance With Infrequent Postdialysis Serum Urea Nitrogen Measurements.
Raimann JG; Ye X; Kotanko P; Daugirdas JT
Am J Kidney Dis; 2020 Jul; 76(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 32220509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Monitoring hemodialysis dose with ionic dialisance in on-line hemodiafiltration].
Maduell F; Puchades MJ; Navarro V; Torregrosa E; Rius A; Sánchez JJ
Nefrologia; 2005; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16392302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration.
Rodriguez A; Morena M; Bargnoux AS; Chenine L; Leray-Moragues H; Cristol JP; Canaud B
Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):E280-E292. PubMed ID: 33507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo effects of dialysate flow rate on Kt/V in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
Hauk M; Kuhlmann MK; Riegel W; Köhler H
Am J Kidney Dis; 2000 Jan; 35(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 10620551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urea kinetic modeling at high urea clearances: implications for clinical practice.
Abramson F; Gibson S; Barlee V; Bosch JP
Adv Ren Replace Ther; 1994 Apr; 1(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 7641088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.
Marshall MR; Golper TA; Shaver MJ; Alam MG; Chatoth DK
Am J Kidney Dis; 2002 Mar; 39(3):556-70. PubMed ID: 11877575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a two-pool model for the kinetics of beta2-microglobulin.
Stiller S; Xu XQ; Gruner N; Vienken J; Mann H
Int J Artif Organs; 2002 May; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 12074339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis.
Lindsay RM; Bene B; Goux N; Heidenheim AP; Landgren C; Sternby J
Am J Kidney Dis; 2001 Sep; 38(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 11532690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The variable target model: a paradigm shift in the incremental haemodialysis prescription.
Casino FG; Basile C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2017 Jan; 32(1):182-190. PubMed ID: 27742823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double target comparison of blood-side methods for measuring the hemodialysis dose.
Prado M; Roa LM; Palma A; Milán JA
Kidney Int; 2005 Dec; 68(6):2863-76. PubMed ID: 16316364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of pre- and postdilutional on-line hemodiafiltration adequacy by partial dialysate quantification and on-line urea monitor.
Lim PS; Lee HP; Kho B; Yu YL; Chang SC; Lin YY; Yang CC; Wang TH; Kuo SY; Lin LC
Blood Purif; 1999; 17(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 10494022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Update on Postdialysis Rebound by a New Technology in Hemodialysis.
Testal AG; Marín DH; Maset RG; Maicas PR; Salvador ISR; Díaz PO; Najera JEF; De Juan ET; Carrera CB
Ther Apher Dial; 2017 Oct; 21(5):473-477. PubMed ID: 28795535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radionuclide method for evaluating the performance of hemodialysis in vivo.
Bihl GR; Bird NJ; Peters C; Bradley JR; Peters AM
Kidney Int; 2005 Feb; 67(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 15673322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study.
Daugirdas JT; Greene T; Depner TA; Leypoldt J; Gotch F; Schulman G; Star R;
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):194-203. PubMed ID: 14694173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
