These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10937247)

  • 1. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects.
    Day T
    Evolution; 2000 Jun; 54(3):715-30. PubMed ID: 10937247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Apr; 95(9):5106-11. PubMed ID: 9560236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The costs of choice in sexual selection.
    Pomiankowski A
    J Theor Biol; 1987 Sep; 128(2):195-218. PubMed ID: 3431135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. THE EVOLUTION OF MATE PREFERENCES FOR MULTIPLE SEXUAL ORNAMENTS.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 1994 Jun; 48(3):853-867. PubMed ID: 28568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of sexual preferences in quantitative characters.
    Karlin S; Raper J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1990 Dec; 38(3):306-30. PubMed ID: 2293401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continual change in mate preferences.
    Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6548):420-2. PubMed ID: 7566117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of mating preference and sexual dimorphism.
    Lande R; Arnold SJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 4094458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolutionary significance of sexual selection.
    Engen S; Saether BE
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Nov; 117(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 4079450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual conflict and speciation.
    Parker GA; Partridge L
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Feb; 353(1366):261-74. PubMed ID: 9533125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION.
    Pomiankowski A; Iwasa Y; Nee S
    Evolution; 1991 Sep; 45(6):1422-1430. PubMed ID: 28563819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.
    Houle D; Kondrashov AS
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Runaway sexual selection with paternal transmission of the male trait and gene-culture determination of the female preference.
    Ihara Y; Aoki K; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Feb; 63(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 12464495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits.
    Schluter D; Price T
    Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Jul; 253(1336):117-22. PubMed ID: 8396772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection.
    Higashi M; Takimoto G; Yamamura N
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761):523-6. PubMed ID: 10591210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fisher's sons' effect in sexual selection: absent, intermittent or just low experimental power?
    Sharma MD; Wilson AJ; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):2464-2470. PubMed ID: 27575647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mate-sampling costs and sexy sons.
    Kokko H; Booksmythe I; Jennions MD
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):259-66. PubMed ID: 25399634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.
    Lüpold S; Manier MK; Puniamoorthy N; Schoff C; Starmer WT; Luepold SH; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7604):535-8. PubMed ID: 27225128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mating preferences of selfish sex chromosomes.
    Muralidhar P
    Nature; 2019 Jun; 570(7761):376-379. PubMed ID: 31168095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.