These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10937247)

  • 21. The dilemma of Fisherian sexual selection: mate choice for indirect benefits despite rarity and overall weakness of trait-preference genetic correlation.
    Greenfield MD; Alem S; Limousin D; Bailey NW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3524-36. PubMed ID: 25308282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fisher's lost model of runaway sexual selection.
    Henshaw JM; Jones AG
    Evolution; 2020 Feb; 74(2):487-494. PubMed ID: 31886520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The handicap process favors exaggerated, rather than reduced, sexual ornaments.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Sep; 68(9):2534-49. PubMed ID: 24837599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals.
    Garcia CM; Ramirez E
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):501-5. PubMed ID: 15791255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females.
    Ball MA; Parker GA
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Sep; 224(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 12900202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Models of sexual selection on a quantitative genetic trait when preference is acquired by sexual imprinting.
    Aoki K; Feldman MW; Kerr B
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11263743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mate-choice copying: A fitness-enhancing behavior that evolves by indirect selection.
    Santos M; Sapage M; Matos M; Varela SAM
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1456-1464. PubMed ID: 28334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone.
    Peterson MA; Honchak BM; Locke SE; Beeman TE; Mendoza J; Green J; Buckingham KJ; White MA; Monsen KJ
    Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2639-55. PubMed ID: 16526511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The evolution of sexual imprinting through reinforcement.
    Yeh DJ; Boughman JW; Saetre GP; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29741268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement.
    Lemmon AR; Smadja C; Kirkpatrick M
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jan; 17(1):177-83. PubMed ID: 15000660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ecological and reproductive character displacement on an environmental gradient.
    Goldberg EE; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1344-57. PubMed ID: 16929652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
    Iyengar VK; Reeve HK; Eisner T
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):830-2. PubMed ID: 12397356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the logic of Fisherian sexual selection.
    Veller C; Muralidhar P; Haig D
    Evolution; 2020 Jul; 74(7):1234-1245. PubMed ID: 32128812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10937179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.