These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10937315)

  • 1. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation.
    Lewandowsky S; Mundy M; Tan GP
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Jun; 6(2):104-23. PubMed ID: 10937315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive automation, trust, and self-confidence in fault management of time-critical tasks.
    Moray N; Inagaki T; Itoh M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2000 Mar; 6(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 10937311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems.
    Lee J; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1243-70. PubMed ID: 1516577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. System-wide versus component-specific trust using multiple aids.
    Keller D; Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 20198819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I trust it, but I don't know why: effects of implicit attitudes toward automation on trust in an automated system.
    Merritt SM; Heimbaugh H; LaChapell J; Lee D
    Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):520-34. PubMed ID: 23829027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.
    Lee JD; See KA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):50-80. PubMed ID: 15151155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():333-42. PubMed ID: 26360226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information.
    McGuirl JM; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17240714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward Quantifying Trust Dynamics: How People Adjust Their Trust After Moment-to-Moment Interaction With Automation.
    Yang XJ; Schemanske C; Searle C
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):862-878. PubMed ID: 34459266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trustworthiness and IT suspicion: an evaluation of the nomological network.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK; Eschleman KJ; Alarcon GM; Barelka AJ
    Hum Factors; 2011 Jun; 53(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 21830509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation.
    Pop VL; Shrewsbury A; Durso FT
    Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):545-56. PubMed ID: 25977317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of human-machine competition on intent errors in a target detection task.
    Beck HP; McKinney JB; Dzindolet MT; Pierce LG
    Hum Factors; 2009 Aug; 51(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 19899358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influencing Trust for Human-Automation Collaborative Scheduling of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles.
    Clare AS; Cummings ML; Repenning NP
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1208-18. PubMed ID: 26060238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of extended lay-off periods on performance and operator trust under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Wastell D; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Mar; 53 Pt A():241-51. PubMed ID: 26603139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.