These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10937748)

  • 1. Radiation dose and image information in computed radiography. A phantom study of angle measurements in the weight-bearing knee.
    Sanfridsson J; Holje G; Svahn G; Ryd L; Jonsson K
    Acta Radiol; 2000 Jul; 41(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 10937748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthopaedic measurements with computed radiography. Methodological development, accuracy, and radiation dose with special reference to the weight-bearing lower extremity and the dislocating patella.
    Sanfridsson J
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2001; (423):1-40. PubMed ID: 11338793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
    Ludlow JB
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EOS Micro-dose Protocol: First Full-spine Radiation Dose Measurements in Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Comparisons with EOS Standard-dose and Conventional Digital Radiology.
    Pedersen PH; Petersen AG; Østgaard SE; Tvedebrink T; Eiskjær SP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1313-E1321. PubMed ID: 30383725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
    Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
    Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography].
    Visser H; Hermann KP; Bredemeier S; Köhler B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jul; 4(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 10994319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional X ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters.
    Koivisto J; Kiljunen T; Wolff J; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 23825221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of MOSFET dosimeters for low-dose measurements in maxillofacial anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Koivisto JH; Wolff JE; Kiljunen T; Schulze D; Kortesniemi M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):266–278. PubMed ID: 26219008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification.
    Jurik AG; Jensen LC; Hansen J
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 8915269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed radiography dual energy subtraction: performance evaluation when detecting low-contrast lung nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Davis DL; McNitt-Gray M; Goldin J; Hart E; Batra P; Johnson TD
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 10036665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-ray pelvimetry--which is the best technique?
    Badr I; Thomas SM; Cotterill AD; Pettett A; Oduko JM; Fitzgerald M; Adam EJ
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Feb; 52(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9043048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Blastaris GA; Moutsatsos AS; Chios PS; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 18245792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of dose and image quality for computed radiography and digital radiography.
    Aldrich JE; Duran E; Dunlop P; Mayo JR
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 16511674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.