BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10938312)

  • 1. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.
    Scheidt RA; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Conditt MA; Rymer WZ; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):853-62. PubMed ID: 10938312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-joint coupling strategy during adaptation to novel viscous loads in human arm movement.
    Debicki DB; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug; 92(2):754-65. PubMed ID: 15056688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of kinematic redundancy in adaptation of reaching.
    Yang JF; Scholz JP; Latash ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 176(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 16874517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kinetic and kinematic adaptation to anisotropic load.
    Shemmell J; Corcos DM; Hasan Z
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18726588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to move amid uncertainty.
    Scheidt RA; Dingwell JB; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Aug; 86(2):971-85. PubMed ID: 11495965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor adaptation to a small force field superimposed on a large background force.
    Liu J; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 178(3):402-14. PubMed ID: 17091296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm?
    Kluzik J; Diedrichsen J; Shadmehr R; Bastian AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 100(3):1455-64. PubMed ID: 18596187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of age-related modifications of upper limb motor control strategies in a new dynamic environment.
    Cesqui B; Macrì G; Dario P; Micera S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 5():31. PubMed ID: 19019228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke.
    Cirstea MC; Mitnitski AB; Feldman AG; Levin MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Aug; 151(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 12819841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.
    Rand MK; Shimansky Y; Stelmach GE; Bloedel JR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(1):50-65. PubMed ID: 14530893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of arm trajectory during continuous drawing movements in different dynamic environments.
    Fukushi T; Ashe J
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 12478400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anticipatory control of center of mass and joint stability during voluntary arm movement from a standing posture: interplay between active and passive control.
    Patla AE; Ishac MG; Winter DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 11889509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive use of interaction torque during arm reaching movement from the optimal control viewpoint.
    Vu VH; Isableu B; Berret B
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38845. PubMed ID: 27941920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Directional tuning effects during cyclical two-joint arm movements in the horizontal plane.
    Levin O; Ouamer M; Steyvers M; Swinnen SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 141(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 11810141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation.
    Hinder MR; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 165(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15856204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of interaction force levels on degree of motor adaptation in a stable dynamic force field.
    Lai EJ; Hodgson AJ; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Nov; 153(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 12955384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment.
    Schabowsky CN; Hidler JM; Lum PS
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 182(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 17611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced Kinematic Redundancy and Motor Equivalence During Whole-Body Reaching in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.
    Tomita Y; Mullick AA; Levin MF
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2018 Feb; 32(2):175-186. PubMed ID: 29554848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated coriolis and interaction torques.
    Pigeon P; Bortolami SB; DiZio P; Lackner JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):276-89. PubMed ID: 12522179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.