These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10939052)

  • 1. Differences in recognition and impressions of animate and inanimate objects in which features are deleted or added.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1079-90. PubMed ID: 10939052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetric effects on recognition of animate objects by children.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):995-9. PubMed ID: 10876357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric recognition of pictures of cats as a function of age in 4-, 5-, and 6-year-old children.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y; Nakamura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):279-84. PubMed ID: 17037672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of asymmetric alterations to pictures of cats and geometric shapes: effects of method and type of alteration.
    Ando M
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):965-74. PubMed ID: 10876355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognition of asymmetric alterations to pictures of cats: effects of method of alteration and type of change in elderly subjects.
    Ando M; Hakoda Y; Ogasawara E; Shiihara Y; Otsubo M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Feb; 110(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 20391871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adults' and children's recognition of items added to or deleted from scenes: salience, complexity, and unnaturalness.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1113-21. PubMed ID: 10939055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.
    Wiggett AJ; Pritchard IC; Downing PE
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3111-7. PubMed ID: 19631673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization.
    Zachariou V; Del Giacco AC; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2018 Nov; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 30458511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. It's alive! animate motion captures visual attention.
    Pratt J; Radulescu PV; Guo RM; Abrams RA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1724-30. PubMed ID: 20974713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired identification of impoverished animate but not inanimate objects in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.
    Burnett HG; Panis S; Wagemans J; Jellema T
    Autism Res; 2015 Feb; 8(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 25256015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of items added to or deleted from scenes: method of alterations, type of alterations, and salience.
    Ando M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Feb; 94(1):327-32. PubMed ID: 11883582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality.
    Falmier O; Young ME
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):473-500. PubMed ID: 18792720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Animate Objects are Detected More Frequently than Inanimate Objects in Inattentional Blindness Tasks Independently of Threat.
    Calvillo DP; Hawkins WC
    J Gen Psychol; 2016; 143(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 27055078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Asymmetric confusability effect in recognition memory of cats pictures].
    Ando M; Hakoda Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1999 Jun; 70(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 10488496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Framing pictures: the role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.
    Friedman A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Sep; 108(3):316-55. PubMed ID: 528908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study.
    Kaduk K; Elsner B; Reid VM
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 6():14-22. PubMed ID: 23811318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical representation of animate and inanimate objects in complex natural scenes.
    Naselaris T; Stansbury DE; Gallant JL
    J Physiol Paris; 2012; 106(5-6):239-49. PubMed ID: 22472178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pigeons see correspondence between objects and their pictures.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):966-72. PubMed ID: 17176429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Asymmetric effects of addition versus deletion on change detection task: the role of feeling of something strange].
    Uchino Y; Hakoda Y; Shibata M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Jun; 76(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 16022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The shape of novel objects contributes to shared impressions.
    Kurosu A; Todorov A
    J Vis; 2017 Nov; 17(13):14. PubMed ID: 29192313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.