These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10939052)

  • 21. [Asymmetric confusability effects in recognition memory of line drawings].
    Uchino Y; Hakoda Y; Yamada N
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2000 Jun; 71(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 10998782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selective impairments of object knowledge in a case of acquired cortical blindness.
    Powell J; Davidoff J
    Memory; 1995; 3(3-4):435-61. PubMed ID: 8574873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Distinct processing for pictures of animals and objects: evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang A; Yan M; Zhu Z; Chen C; Wang Y
    Emotion; 2012 Jun; 12(3):540-51. PubMed ID: 22251055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Asymmetric confusability effects in recognition memory of butterfly pictures].
    Ando M; Hakoda Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1998 Apr; 69(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Salience of the lambs: a test of the saliency map hypothesis with pictures of emotive objects.
    Humphrey K; Underwood G; Lambert T
    J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22279240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and the animate/inanimate effect.
    Bi Y; Han Z; Shu H; Caramazza A
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Jul; 24(5):485-504. PubMed ID: 18416503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of size congruency on item and size recognition with words or pictures.
    Standing LG; Bertrand MI
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 19093606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neutral animals matter: Animacy modulates object-based attentional allocation.
    Hu S; Yang T; Zhang H; Gao Y; Zhao J; Wang Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Mar; 76(3):583-595. PubMed ID: 35400222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation.
    Pierroutsakos SL; Deloache JS; Gound M; Bernard EN
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15985066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Functional relations trump implied motion in recovery from extinction: evidence from the effects of animacy on extinction.
    Riddoch MJ; Riveros R; Humphreys GW
    Neurocase; 2011 Feb; 17(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 20672224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited: norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects.
    Magnié MN; Besson M; Poncet M; Dolisi C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Jun; 25(4):521-60. PubMed ID: 12911106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition memory for components of pictures in children and adults.
    Ironsmith M
    Child Dev; 1980 Sep; 51(3):899-901. PubMed ID: 7418516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Animates are better remembered than inanimates: further evidence from word and picture stimuli.
    Bonin P; Gelin M; Bugaiska A
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 24078605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Picture memory: recognizing added and deleted details.
    Pezdek K; Maki R; Valencia-Laver D; Whetstone T; Stoeckert J; Dougherty T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):468-76. PubMed ID: 2969943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Infants' cross-modal transfer from solid objects to their graphic representations.
    Rose SA; Gottfried AW; Bridger WH
    Child Dev; 1983 Jun; 54(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 6851715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) discriminate between pictures of conspecific males and females without specific training.
    Koba R; Izumi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 Sep; 79(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 18515019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Curvilinear features are important for animate/inanimate categorization in macaques.
    Yetter M; Robert S; Mammarella G; Richmond B; Eldridge MAG; Ungerleider LG; Yue X
    J Vis; 2021 Apr; 21(4):3. PubMed ID: 33798259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relevance ratings and salience categorizations for objects in a set of 80 pictures.
    Marcell MM; Williams E
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):438-51. PubMed ID: 20479174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Addition and deletion of objects on memory for composition of scenes.
    Yamada N; Hakoda Y; Uchino Y
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1203-19. PubMed ID: 9709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing perceptual change with an ambiguous figures task: Normative data for 40 standard picture sets.
    Stöttinger E; Sepahvand NM; Danckert J; Anderson B
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 25701106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.