These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10939058)

  • 1. Effect of the intensity of wireless telephone conversations on reaction time in a braking response.
    Irwin M; Fitzgerald C; Berg WP
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1130-4. PubMed ID: 10939058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.
    Consiglio W; Driscoll P; Witte M; Berg WP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Jul; 35(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12729813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance.
    Rakauskas ME; Gugerty LJ; Ward NJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 15474548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capturing attention to brake lamps.
    McIntyre SE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):691-6. PubMed ID: 18329422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hands-free versus hand-held cell phone conversation on a braking response by young drivers.
    Hendrick JL; Switzer JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 18065072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimal study of young male drivers' responses to vehicle collision using EMG of lower extremity.
    Gao Z; Li C; Hu H; Zhao H; Chen C; Yu H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S563-73. PubMed ID: 26406050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Definition of simulated driving tests for the evaluation of drivers' reactions and responses.
    Bartolozzi R; Frendo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 24372503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Couples, contentious conversations, mobile telephone use and driving.
    Lansdown TC; Stephens AN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():416-22. PubMed ID: 22703991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking.
    Van Winsum W; Heino A
    Ergonomics; 1996 Apr; 39(4):579-92. PubMed ID: 8854979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a sudden brake warning system: effect on the response time of the following driver.
    Isler RB; Starkey NJ
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 20034608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on emergency braking performance.
    Engström J; Aust ML; Viström M
    Hum Factors; 2010 Oct; 52(5):551-9. PubMed ID: 21186735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.
    Mohebbi R; Gray R; Tan HZ
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 19634313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies.
    Markkula G; Engström J; Lodin J; Bärgman J; Victor T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):209-26. PubMed ID: 27450793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How fleeting emotions affect hazard perception and steering while driving: the impact of image arousal and valence.
    Trick LM; Brandigampola S; Enns JT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():222-9. PubMed ID: 22269504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age and distraction by telephone conversation in task performance: implications for use of cellular telephones while driving.
    Lyda L; Osborne VM; Coleman P; Rienzi B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):391-4. PubMed ID: 12027328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical predictors of older driver performance on a standardized road test.
    Classen S; Horgas A; Awadzi K; Messinger-Rapport B; Shechtman O; Joo Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 18836957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of looming and attention capture in drivers' braking responses.
    Terry HR; Charlton SG; Perrone JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1375-82. PubMed ID: 18606269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study.
    Sonnleitner A; Treder MS; Simon M; Willmann S; Ewald A; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():110-8. PubMed ID: 24144496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.
    Beede KE; Kass SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 16310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.