These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10939506)

  • 1. A comparison of analogue and digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and diagnostic quality of the images.
    Axelsson B; Bodén K; Fransson SG; Hansson IB; Persliden J; Witt HH
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 10939506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbed dose and image quality in examinations of the colon with digital and analogue techniques.
    Persliden J; Larsson P; Norén B; Wirell S
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Nov; 38(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 9394659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.
    Geijer H; Beckman K; Jonsson B; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):402-10. PubMed ID: 11161153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
    Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations.
    Persliden J; Helmrot E; Hjort P; Resjö M
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Apr; 14(4):638-44. PubMed ID: 14634780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
    Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization.
    Geijer H; Verdonck B; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):543-51. PubMed ID: 12594558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nationwide surveys of chest, abdomen, lumbosacral spine radiography, and upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: a summary of findings.
    Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Hilohi MC; Moyal AE
    Health Phys; 2010 Mar; 98(3):498-514. PubMed ID: 20147791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Projection X-ray Imaging: Radiography, Mammography, Fluoroscopy.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 30585956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of patient dose for examinations of the upper gastrointestinal tract at 11 conventional and digital X-ray units in The Netherlands.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Chandie Shaw MP; Schultz FW; Teeuwisse W; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):745-53. PubMed ID: 9771385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical aspects of quality criteria in digital radiography.
    Vetter S; Strecker EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11487839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Organ and effective doses in infants undergoing upper gastrointestinal (UGI) fluoroscopic examination.
    Staton RJ; Williams JL; Arreola MM; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):703-10. PubMed ID: 17388188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of film-screen combination and digital fluorography in gastrointestinal barium examinations in a clinical setting.
    Barkhof F; David E; de Geest F
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 22(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 8832239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of optimized ultralow-dose pulsed fluoroscopy for upper gastrointestinal tract examinations: a phantom study with clinical correlation.
    Weiss J; Pomschar A; Rist C; Neumaier K; Li M; Flatz W; Thierfelder K; Notohamiprodjo M
    Radiol Med; 2017 Nov; 122(11):822-828. PubMed ID: 28733918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paediatric dose reduction with the introduction of digital fluorography.
    Mooney RB; McKinstry J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing the absorbed dose in analogue radiography of infant chest images by improving the image quality, using image processing techniques.
    Karimian A; Yazdani S; Askari MA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):176-9. PubMed ID: 21743073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality.
    Eloot L; Thierens H; Taeymans Y; Drieghe B; De Pooter J; Van Peteghem S; Buytaert D; Gijs T; Lapere R; Bacher K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):E205-12. PubMed ID: 25754018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of a patient dose monitoring system in conventional digital X-ray imaging: initial experiences.
    Heilmaier C; Zuber N; Weishaupt D
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1021-1031. PubMed ID: 27339438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of analog and digital fluoroscopy devices regarding patient radiation exposure in enteroclysis].
    Maataoui A; Reusch E; Khan MF; Gurung J; Thalhammer A; Ackermann H; Mulert-Ernst R; Vogl TJ; Jacobi V
    Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 18278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.