These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10940061)
1. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites. Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial. Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin closure in carpal tunnel surgery: a prospective comparative study between nylon, polyglactin 910 and stainless steel sutures. Menovsky T; Bartels RH; van Lindert EL; Grotenhuis JA Hand Surg; 2004 Jul; 9(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15368623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of polydioxanone and polyglactin 910 in intradermal repair. Guyuron B; Vaughan C Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Oct; 98(5):817-20. PubMed ID: 8823020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. Matalia J; Panmand P; Ghalla P Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):661-664. PubMed ID: 29676310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions. Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suture Selection for Incision Closure in Pediatric Cataract Surgery: A Dilemma for Pediatric Ophthalmologists. Agarwal P; Maan V; Sutar S; Chauhan L J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2022; 59(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 35076313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesion formation to incisional abdominal wound in response to polyamide "6" and polyglactin "910" sutures. Ansari AG J Pak Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 42(8):184-5. PubMed ID: 1433796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats. Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective controlled study of a 10/0 absorbable polyglactin suture for corneal incision phacoemulsification. Bainbridge JW; Teimory M; Kirwan JF; Rostron CK Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 3a)():399-402. PubMed ID: 9775239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, multi-centric, international, single-arm, cohort study to assess a synthetic polyamide suture material in oral surgery to close the mucosa - MUCODA study. García-González S; Aboul-Hosn Centenero S; Baumann P; Fita-Esteban I; Hernández-Alfaro F; Weyer N J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104922. PubMed ID: 38490322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of nonabsorbable and absorbable sutures for use in oculoplastic surgery. Linberg JV; Mangano LM; Odom JV Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1991; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2018745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of 10-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds. Sugar A Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 6244525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery. Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Role of modern absorbable suture materials in decreasing the occurrence of early complications after laparotomy]. Bohanes T; Neoral C; Klein J; Havlík R; Aujeský R; Král V Rozhl Chir; 2002 Nov; 81 Suppl 1():S24-6. PubMed ID: 12666487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in corporeal plication for treatment of congenital penile curvature. Basiri A; Sarhangnejad R; Ghahestani SM; Radfar MH Urol J; 2011; 8(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22090050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]