BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10940953)

  • 1. Economic analysis of two models of low-risk maternity care: a freestanding birth center compared to traditional care.
    Stone PW; Zwanziger J; Hinton Walker P; Buenting J
    Res Nurs Health; 2000 Aug; 23(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10940953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternity care outcomes: assessing a nursing model of care for low-risk pregnancy.
    Stone PW
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 9582819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic implications of home births and birth centers: a structured review.
    Henderson J; Petrou S
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 18507585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised controlled trial comparing birthing centre care with delivery suite care in Adelaide, Australia.
    Byrne JP; Crowther CA; Moss JR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 Aug; 40(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 11065032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in woman at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
    Schroeder E; Petrou S; Patel N; Hollowell J; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Brocklehurst P;
    BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2292. PubMed ID: 22517916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The economic costs of intrapartum care in Tower Hamlets: A comparison between the cost of birth in a freestanding midwifery unit and hospital for women at low risk of obstetric complications.
    Schroeder L; Patel N; Keeler M; Rocca-Ihenacho L; Macfarlane AJ
    Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():28-35. PubMed ID: 27984773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis: birth center vs. hospital care.
    Stone PW; Walker PH
    Nurs Econ; 1995; 13(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 7566209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring cost and quality: community-based versus traditional hospital delivery systems.
    Walker PH; Stone PW
    J Health Care Finance; 1996; 23(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 8889977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A non-randomised trial investigating the cost-effectiveness of Midwifery Group Practice compared with standard maternity care arrangements in one Australian hospital.
    Toohill J; Turkstra E; Gamble J; Scuffham PA
    Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e874-9. PubMed ID: 22172743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Single room maternity care: perinatal outcomes, economic costs,and physician preferences.
    Harris SJ; Farren MD; Janssen PA; Klein MC; Lee SK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Jul; 26(7):633-40. PubMed ID: 15248932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are low-risk maternity clinics financially viable?
    Oliver C
    Can Fam Physician; 1997 Jun; 43():1044. PubMed ID: 9189284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
    Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flawed analysis may be used to restrict birth choices.
    Hull PM
    BMJ; 2012 Jun; 344():e3842; author reply e3848. PubMed ID: 22661731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costs of publicly provided maternity services in Rosario, Argentina.
    Borghi J; Bastus S; Belizan M; Carroli G; Hutton G; Fox-Rushby J
    Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 12649959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of newborn outcome in a hospital-based birthing center.
    Waskerwitz S; Fournier L; Jones P; Meier W
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1985 May; 24(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 3987167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
    Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.
    Howell E; Palmer A; Benatar S; Garrett B
    Medicare Medicaid Res Rev; 2014; 4(3):. PubMed ID: 25250198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Household costs of healthcare during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period: a case study from Matlab, Bangladesh.
    Borghi J; Sabina N; Blum LS; Hoque ME; Ronsmans C
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2006 Dec; 24(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 17591341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The national birth center study II: Research confirms low Cesarean rates and health care costs at birth centers.
    Garvey M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2013; (106):40, 68. PubMed ID: 23847895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.