BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10942470)

  • 1. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
    Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of fetal heart-rate variability interpretation by obstetricians using the criteria of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development compared with computer-aided interpretation.
    Tongsong T; Iamthongin A; Wanapirak C; Piyamongkol W; Sirichotiyakul S; Boonyanurak P; Tatiyapornkul T; Neelasri C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Feb; 31(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 15669996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome.
    Figueras F; Albela S; Bonino S; Palacio M; Barrau E; Hernandez S; Casellas C; Coll O; Cararach V
    J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 15914348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver reliability of fetal heart rate pattern interpretation using NICHD definitions.
    Epstein AJ; Twogood S; Lee RH; Opper N; Beavis A; Miller DA
    Am J Perinatol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 23161350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abnormal fetal heart rate tracing patterns during the first stage of labor: effect on perinatal outcome.
    Hadar A; Sheiner E; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M; Shoham-Vardi I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 11641667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.
    Bracero LA; Roshanfekr D; Byrne DW
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10914628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to read fetal heart rate tracings in labor: a comparison between ACOG and NICE guidelines.
    Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Martorana R; Martino C; Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2797-8. PubMed ID: 22881995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unselected low-risk pregnancies and the effect of continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring on umbilical blood gases and cerebral palsy.
    Sameshima H; Ikenoue T; Ikeda T; Kamitomo M; Ibara S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 14749646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram improves fetal heart rate tracing interpretation and clinical decision making.
    Ross MG; Devoe LD; Rosen KG
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Mar; 15(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15280144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in fetal heart rate and uterine patterns associated with uterine rupture.
    Sheiner E; Levy A; Ofir K; Hadar A; Shoham-Vardi I; Hallak M; Katz M; Mazor M
    J Reprod Med; 2004 May; 49(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 15214711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing a tool to appraise fetal monitoring guidelines for women at low obstetric risk.
    Hindley C; Hinsliff SW; Thomson AM
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 16194184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings in patients with neonatal seizures vs. no seizures: what are the differences?
    Williams KP; Galerneau F
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(5):422-5. PubMed ID: 15493719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring in cases of cytomegalovirus infection.
    Kaneko M; Sameshima H; Ikeda T; Ikenoue T; Minematsu T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1257-62. PubMed ID: 15507950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual interpretation of the effect of maternal betamethasone administration on the fetal heart rate pattern.
    van Iddekinge B; Hofmeyr GJ; Buchmann E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 12881071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: research guidelines for interpretation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Research Planning Workshop.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 177(6):1385-90. PubMed ID: 9423739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal heart rate baselines in twins. Interobserver agreement in antepartum estimation.
    Bernardes J; Costa-Pereira A; Calejo L; Ayres-de-Campos D; PatrĂ­cio B; Pereira-Leite L
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10710739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive value of late decelerations for fetal acidemia in unselective low-risk pregnancies.
    Sameshima H; Ikenoue T
    Am J Perinatol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15668840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.