304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10942470)
21. Diagnosis and management of intrapartum fetal distress.
van Geijn HP; Copray FJ; Donkers DK; Bos MH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Dec; 42 Suppl():S63-72. PubMed ID: 1809612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the NICHD 3-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Interpretation System.
Blackwell SC; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Gyamfi Bannerman C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 205(4):378.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21864826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of chronic maternal methadone therapy on intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns.
Ramirez-Cacho WA; Flores S; Schrader RM; McKay J; Rayburn WF
J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2006 Feb; 13(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 16443503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Different types of variable decelerations and their effects to neonatal outcome.
Kazandi M; Sendag F; Akercan F; Terek MC; Gundem G
Singapore Med J; 2003 May; 44(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 13677360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intra- and interobserver agreement among obstetric experts in court regarding the review of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and obstetrical management.
Sabiani L; Le Dû R; Loundou A; d'Ercole C; Bretelle F; Boubli L; Carcopino X
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 213(6):856.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26348383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings.
Gagnon R; Campbell MK; Hunse C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 168(3 Pt 1):842-7. PubMed ID: 8456890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period.
Gonçalves H; Bernardes J; Rocha AP; Ayres-de-Campos D
Early Hum Dev; 2007 Sep; 83(9):585-91. PubMed ID: 17261357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
Ojala K; Mäkikallio K; Haapsamo M; Ijäs H; Tekay A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 18446537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation.
Hankins GD; Miller DA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21278495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography.
Chen CY; Yu C; Chang CC; Lin CW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112296. PubMed ID: 25437442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN.
Westerhuis ME; van Horen E; Kwee A; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Moons KG
BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19250366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems].
Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems.
Gyamfi Bannerman C; Grobman WA; Antoniewicz L; Hutchinson M; Blackwell S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 205(3):288.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22071068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis and neural networks in antepartum fetal surveillance.
Devoe LD
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Apr; 8(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 8734127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intrapartum nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and prediction of adverse outcomes: interobserver variability.
Chauhan SP; Klauser CK; Woodring TC; Sanderson M; Magann EF; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 199(6):623.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18667185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of narcotic and non-narcotic continuous epidural anesthesia on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings as measured by computer analysis.
Hoffman CT; Guzman ER; Richardson MJ; Vintzileos A; Houlihan C; Benito C
J Matern Fetal Med; 1997; 6(4):200-5. PubMed ID: 9260115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: evaluation of a standardized system of interpretation for prediction of metabolic acidosis at delivery and neonatal neurological morbidity.
Soncini E; Paganelli S; Vezzani C; Gargano G; Giovanni Battista LS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Sep; 27(14):1465-9. PubMed ID: 24156253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment.
Todros T; Preve CU; Plazzotta C; Biolcati M; Lombardo P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8886686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The fetal heart rate collaborative practice project: situational awareness in electronic fetal monitoring-a Kaiser Permanente Perinatal Patient Safety Program Initiative.
MacEachin SR; Lopez CM; Powell KJ; Corbett NL
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 23(4):314-23; quiz 324-5. PubMed ID: 19915414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
