354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10942605)
1. A rapid heuristic algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
Rodin A; Li WH
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Aug; 16(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 10942605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A multi-neighbor-joining approach for phylogenetic tree reconstruction and visualization.
Silva AE; Villanueva WJ; Knidel H; Bonato VC; Reis SF; Von Zuben FJ
Genet Mol Res; 2005 Sep; 4(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 16342037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random local neighbor joining: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
Zhang W; Sun Z
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Apr; 47(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 18343690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Representation in stochastic search for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Weber G; Ohno-Machado L; Shieber S
J Biomed Inform; 2006 Feb; 39(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 16359929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.
Kumar S
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Apr; 13(4):584-93. PubMed ID: 8882501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting.
Desper R; Gascuel O
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
Takahashi K; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method.
Tamura K; Nei M; Kumar S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jul; 101(30):11030-5. PubMed ID: 15258291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle.
Desper R; Gascuel O
J Comput Biol; 2002; 9(5):687-705. PubMed ID: 12487758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny.
Katoh K; Kuma K; Miyata T
J Mol Evol; 2001; 53(4-5):477-84. PubMed ID: 11675608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fast computation of distance estimators.
Elias I; Lagergren J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():89. PubMed ID: 17355623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robustness of phylogenetic inference based on minimum evolution.
Pardi F; Guillemot S; Gascuel O
Bull Math Biol; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1820-39. PubMed ID: 20449671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used.
Piontkivska H
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2004 Jun; 31(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 15120384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stochastic search strategy for estimation of maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees.
Salter LA; Pearl DK
Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 12116596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A signal-to-noise analysis of phylogeny estimation by neighbor-joining: Insufficiency of polynomial length sequences.
Lacey MR; Chang JT
Math Biosci; 2006 Feb; 199(2):188-215. PubMed ID: 16412478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The metapopulation genetic algorithm: An efficient solution for the problem of large phylogeny estimation.
Lemmon AR; Milinkovitch MC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Aug; 99(16):10516-21. PubMed ID: 12142465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ML or NJ-MCL? A comparison between two robust phylogenetic methods.
Som A
Comput Biol Chem; 2009 Oct; 33(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 19679513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
