These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943274)

  • 21. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
    Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; CorrĂȘa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Classification of mammographic masses using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks.
    Lim WK; Er MJ
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1288-95. PubMed ID: 15191321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
    Lauria A
    Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generation and application of a probabilistic breast cancer atlas.
    Russakoff DB; Hasegawa A
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):454-61. PubMed ID: 17354804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Zhou C; Chan HP; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2871-82. PubMed ID: 15543797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
    Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
    Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances.
    Tang J; Rangayyan RM; Xu J; El Naqa I; Yang Y
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Mar; 13(2):236-51. PubMed ID: 19171527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic masses using scalable image retrieval.
    Jiang M; Zhang S; Li H; Metaxas DN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Feb; 62(2):783-92. PubMed ID: 25361497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters.
    Kallergi M
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):314-26. PubMed ID: 15000617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.
    Elter M; Horsch A
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2052-68. PubMed ID: 19610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
    Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Methods Used in Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Detection Using Mammograms: A Review.
    Ramadan SZ
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():9162464. PubMed ID: 32300474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography.
    Astley SM
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 1():S20-5. PubMed ID: 15917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
    Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
    Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bilateral analysis based false positive reduction for computer-aided mass detection.
    Wu YT; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Ge J; Shi J; Zhang Y; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3334-44. PubMed ID: 17879797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.