150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943284)
1. Screen-film and digital mammography. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
Haus AG; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):871-98. PubMed ID: 10943284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography.
Hendrick RE; Berns EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):701-18, viii. PubMed ID: 10943272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical aspects of direct digital mammography.
Parkin GJ
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):61-6. PubMed ID: 7734542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Current status and issues of screening digital mammography in Japan.
Yamada T
Breast Cancer; 2010 Jul; 17(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 20143190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new test phantom with different breast tissue compositions for image quality assessment in conventional and digital mammography.
Pachoud M; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5267-81. PubMed ID: 15656276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detectors for digital mammography.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Aug; 3(4):309-24. PubMed ID: 15270582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.
Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Fajardo LL; Boone JM; Kanal K; Mahesh M; Fleischman RC; Och J; Williams MB; Beideck DJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52. PubMed ID: 16878576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population.
Cole E; Pisano ED; Brown M; Kuzmiak C; Braeuning MP; Kim HH; Jong R; Walsh R
Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86. PubMed ID: 15288038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a phantom model.
Krug KB; Stützer H; Girnus R; Zähringer M; Gossmann A; Winnekendonk G; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 17242248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic quality of mammograms obtained with a new low-radiation-dose dual-screen and dual-emulsion film combination.
Wojtasek DA; Teixidor HS; Govoni AF; Gareen IF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Feb; 154(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 2105011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast radiation dose in film/screen mammography.
Prado KL; Rakowski JT; Barragan F; Vanek KN
Health Phys; 1988 Jul; 55(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3391781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
