161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943917)
1. Use of Monte Carlo computation in benchmarking radiotherapy treatment planning system algorithms.
Lewis RD; Ryde SJ; Seaby AW; Hancock DA; Evans CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1755-64. PubMed ID: 10943917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems.
Paelinck L; Reynaert N; Thierens H; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(9):2055-69. PubMed ID: 15843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields.
Jones AO; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):766-76. PubMed ID: 15839349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation.
Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric advantage of using 6 MV over 15 MV photons in conformal therapy of lung cancer: Monte Carlo studies in patient geometries.
Wang L; Yorke E; Desobry G; Chui CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11818004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive evaluation and clinical implementation of commercially available Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm.
Zhang A; Wen N; Nurushev T; Burmeister J; Chetty IJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 14(2):4062. PubMed ID: 23470937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo evaluation of 6 MV intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for head and neck and lung treatments.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2705-17. PubMed ID: 12462739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric verification and clinical evaluation of a new commercially available Monte Carlo-based dose algorithm for application in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning.
Fragoso M; Wen N; Kumar S; Liu D; Ryu S; Movsas B; Munther A; Chetty IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4445-64. PubMed ID: 20668343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective monte carlo dose calculations with limited beam weight information.
Lindsay PE; El Naqa I; Hope AJ; Vicic M; Cui J; Bradley JD; Deasy JO
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):334-46. PubMed ID: 17278519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of experimental 3D dose curves in a heterogeneous phantom with results obtained by MCNP5 simulation and those extracted from a commercial treatment planning system.
Juste B; Miró R; Campayo JM; Díez S; Verdú G
Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):913-7. PubMed ID: 19963391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of monomer/polymer gel dosimetry to study the effects of tissue inhomogeneities on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose distributions.
Vergote K; De Deene Y; Claus F; De Gersem W; Van Duyse B; Paelinck L; Achten E; De Neve W; De Wagter C
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Apr; 67(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 12758248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo validation of the TrueBeam 10XFFF phase-space files for applications in lung SABR.
Teke T; Duzenli C; Bergman A; Viel F; Atwal P; Gete E
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6863-74. PubMed ID: 26632043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
