137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943925)
1. The saturation loss for plane parallel ionization chambers at high dose per pulse values.
Piermattei A; Canne SD; Azario L; Russo A; Fidanzio A; Micelit R; Soriani AT; Orvieto A; Fantini M
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1869-83. PubMed ID: 10943925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ion recombination correction for very high dose-per-pulse high-energy electron beams.
Di Martino F; Giannelli M; Traino AC; Lazzeri M
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7):2204-10. PubMed ID: 16121574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ion recombination correction for very high dose-per-pulse high-energy electron beams.
Di Martino F; Giannelli M; Traino AC; Lazzeri M
Med Phys; 2005 Jul; 32(7Part1):2204-2210. PubMed ID: 28493588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute dose measurements by means of a small cylindrical ionization chamber for very high dose per pulse high energy electron beams.
Karaj E; Righi S; Di Martino F
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):952-8. PubMed ID: 17441241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Charge collection efficiency in ionization chambers exposed to electron beams with high dose per pulse.
Laitano RF; Guerra AS; Pimpinella M; Caporali C; Petrucci A
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6419-36. PubMed ID: 17148826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recombination factors for the cylindrical FC65-G ionization chamber in pulsed photon beams and the plane-parallel Roos ionization chamber in pulsed electron beams.
Berg M; Noerrevang O
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(23):5309-18. PubMed ID: 15656279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Italian affair: the employment of parallel-plate ionization chambers for dose measurements in high dose-per-pulse IORT electron beams.
Cella L; Liuzzi R; Salvatore M
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2918-24. PubMed ID: 20632603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of parallel-plate ionization chambers in reference dosimetry of NOVAC and LIAC
Scalchi P; Ciccotelli A; Felici G; Petrucci A; Massafra R; Piazzi V; D'Avenia P; Cavagnetto F; Cattani F; Romagnoli R; Soriani A
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):321-332. PubMed ID: 28102948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated determination of the ion-recombination correction factor (k
Claessens M; Vanreusel V; Gasparini A; Nascimento LF; Yalvec B; Reniers B; Verellen D
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4536-4545. PubMed ID: 38639653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration of low-energy electron beams from a mobile linear accelerator with plane-parallel chambers using both TG-51 and TG-21 protocols.
Beddar AS; Tailor RC
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(8):N105-10. PubMed ID: 15152696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry - A model to correct for the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber.
Petersson K; Jaccard M; Germond JF; Buchillier T; Bochud F; Bourhis J; Vozenin MC; Bailat C
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1157-1167. PubMed ID: 28094853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct determination of k
Krauss A; Kapsch RP
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035041. PubMed ID: 29327693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the recombination correction factor kS for some specific plane-parallel and cylindrical ionization chambers in pulsed photon and electron beams.
Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Schmachtenberg A; Schmid F; Schüle E
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):N35-50. PubMed ID: 17202615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
Muir BR; Rogers DW
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
