These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943934)

  • 1. Distinguishability analysis of an induced current EIT system using discrete coils.
    Eyüboglu BM; Köksal A; Demirbilek M
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):1997-2009. PubMed ID: 10943934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quasi-static analysis for a class of induced-current EIT systems using discrete coils.
    Köksal A; Eyüboğlu BM; Demirbilek M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 12166866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of several exciting magnetic fields for induced current EIT.
    Gençer NG; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 1994 May; 15 Suppl 2a():A51-7. PubMed ID: 8087050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [An experimental system of induced-current EIT].
    Dong X; You F; Qin M; Shi X; Liu R; Xiang H; Fu F; Cui W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):416-9. PubMed ID: 15250146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distinguishability for magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT).
    Altunel H; Eyüboğlu BM; Köksal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 17202621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of optimum injected current patterns in electrical impedance tomography.
    Köksal A; Eyüboğlu B
    Physiol Meas; 1995 Aug; 16(3 Suppl A):A99-109. PubMed ID: 8528131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
    Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic impedance tomography.
    Tozer JC; Ireland RH; Barber DC; Barker AT
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Apr; 873():353-9. PubMed ID: 10372182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Soni N; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Feb; 52(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 15709661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A data acquisition system for induced current electrical impedance tomography].
    Xiang H; Dong X; Qin M; You F; Shi X; Fu F; Liu R; Ma J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 22(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 16156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical estimation of resistance/conductance by electrical impedance tomography measurements.
    Demidenko E; Hartov A; Paulsen K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):829-38. PubMed ID: 15250635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography.
    de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance imaging using induced currents.
    Freeston IL; Tozer RC
    Physiol Meas; 1995 Aug; 16(3 Suppl A):A257-66. PubMed ID: 8528123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment and calibration of a low-frequency system for electrical impedance tomography (EIT), optimized for use in imaging brain function in ambulant human subjects.
    Holder DS; González-Correa CA; Tidswell T; Gibson A; Cusick G; Bayford RH
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Apr; 873():512-9. PubMed ID: 10372187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A high frequency electrical impedance tomograph using distributed parallel input channels.
    Jossinet J; Trillaud C; Risacher F; McAdams ET
    Med Prog Technol; 1993-1994; 19(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 8052171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalized optimal current patterns and electrical safety in EIT.
    Lionheart WR; Kaipio J; McLeod CN
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11236893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes.
    Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Seo JK; Lee JY; Baek WS
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(13):1971-86. PubMed ID: 12884929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of EIT system performance.
    Yasin M; Böhm S; Gaggero PO; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):851-65. PubMed ID: 21646713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.