130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10943940)
1. Comment on 'viability of the EUD and TCP concepts as reliable dose indicators'.
Vaarkamp J; Zhu Y
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Jul; 45(7):L11-6. PubMed ID: 10943940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Viability of the EUD and TCP concepts as reliable dose indicators.
Ebert MA
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 45(2):441-57. PubMed ID: 10701514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From physical dose constraints to equivalent uniform dose constraints in inverse radiotherapy planning.
Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Niemierko A; Nill S
Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2332-9. PubMed ID: 14528955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. RADBIOMOD: A simple program for utilising biological modelling in radiotherapy plan evaluation.
Chang JH; Gehrke C; Prabhakar R; Gill S; Wada M; Lim Joon D; Khoo V
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):248-54. PubMed ID: 26549777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of dose distributions through the max and mean dose concept.
Thieke C; Bortfeld T; Küfer KH
Acta Oncol; 2002; 41(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 12102160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer is required to avoid tumor underdose.
Castelli J; Simon A; Rigaud B; Chajon E; Thariat J; Benezery K; Vauleon E; Jegoux F; Henry O; Lafond C; de Crevoisier R
Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1267-1270. PubMed ID: 29706107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of techniques for simulating set-up error and uncertainty in head and neck IMRT.
Ploquin N; Kay I; Rangel-Baltazar A; Lau H; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3213-9. PubMed ID: 17022214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in head and neck cancer.
Grégoire V
Rays; 2005; 30(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 16294902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The theoretical benefit of beam fringe compensation and field size reduction for iso-normal tissue complication probability dose escalation in radiotherapy of lung cancer.
Engelsman M; Remeijer P; van Herk M; Mijnheer B; Damen E
Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EUD-based biological optimization for carbon ion therapy.
Brüningk SC; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6248-57. PubMed ID: 26520717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head and Neck Margin Reduction With Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Robustness of Treatment Plans Against Anatomy Changes.
van Kranen S; Hamming-Vrieze O; Wolf A; Damen E; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 27681762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The modified linear-quadratic model of Guerrero and Li can be derived from a mechanistic basis and exhibits linear-quadratic-linear behaviour.
Carlone M; Wilkins D; Raaphorst P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):L9-13; author reply L13-5. PubMed ID: 15876677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of a radiation time prolongation factor for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Bakai A; Alber M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(2):N25-9. PubMed ID: 12587911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should single or distributed parameters be used to explain the steepness of tumour control probability curves?
Daşu A; Toma-Daşu I; Fowler JF
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):387-97. PubMed ID: 12608614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of calculation grid size on head and neck IMRT.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(3):209-217. PubMed ID: 27847266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment simulation approaches for the estimation of the distributions of treatment quality parameters generated by geometrical uncertainties.
Baum C; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5475-88. PubMed ID: 15724537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of surface and build-up region dose for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer.
Chung H; Jin H; Dempsey JF; Liu C; Palta J; Suh TS; Kim S
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2682-9. PubMed ID: 16193799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy requirements for head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on observed dose response of the major salivary glands.
Kapanen M; Collan J; Saarilahti K; Heikkonen J; Kairemo K; Tenhunen M
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19435641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
