These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10944886)

  • 1. A rapid appraisal method for the selection and pre-testing of environmental health leaflets.
    Harvey HD; Fleming P
    J R Soc Promot Health; 2000 Jun; 120(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 10944886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The readability and suitability of sexual health promotion leaflets.
    Corcoran N; Ahmad F
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Feb; 99(2):284-6. PubMed ID: 26492864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How readable are health education leaflets?
    Ormrod J; Robinson M
    Health Visit; 1994 Dec; 67(12):424-5. PubMed ID: 7829342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The suitability of United States Pharmacopoeia Dispensory Information psychotropic drug leaflets for urban patients with limited reading skills.
    Wilson FL
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 1999 Aug; 13(4):204-11. PubMed ID: 10478498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Consensus on the legibility criteria of health education leaflets].
    Barrio-Cantalejo I; Simón-Lorda P; Jiménez MM; Ruiz AM
    An Sist Sanit Navar; 2011; 34(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 21904399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses.
    Mumford ME
    J Adv Nurs; 1997 Nov; 26(5):985-91. PubMed ID: 9372404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality of written information for parents regarding the management of a febrile convulsion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paul F; Jones MC; Hendry C; Adair PM
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2308-22. PubMed ID: 18036121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Suitability and readability assessment of printed educational materials on hypertension].
    Lee TW; Kang SJ; Kim HH; Woo SR; Kim S
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2011 Jun; 41(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 21804342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-appropriate health literacy educational materials in ophthalmology.
    Mikhail D; Visscher KL; Chen N; Wang J; Emara BY; Hutnik CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 50(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 25677278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability.
    Shieh C; Hosei B
    J Community Health Nurs; 2008; 25(2):73-90. PubMed ID: 18449833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The readability and audience acceptance of printed health promotion materials used by environmental health departments.
    Harvey HD; Fleming P
    J Environ Health; 2003; 65(6):22-8. PubMed ID: 12575638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does reading about stroke increase stroke knowledge? The impact of different print materials.
    Mazor KM; Billings-Gagliardi S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2003 Nov; 51(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 14630377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial.
    Little P; Griffin S; Kelly J; Dickson N; Sadler C
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7149):1948-52. PubMed ID: 9641933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How readable are orthodontic patient information leaflets?
    Harwood A; Harrison JE
    J Orthod; 2004 Sep; 31(3):210-9; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 15489365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact and use of written leaflets as a counselling alternative in mass antenatal HIV screening.
    Sherr L; Hedge B
    AIDS Care; 1990; 2(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 2088519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma.
    Smith H; Gooding S; Brown R; Frew A
    BMJ; 1998 Jul; 317(7153):264-5. PubMed ID: 9677221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing Readability: Are Urogynecologic Patient Education Materials at an Appropriate Reading Level?
    Haller J; Keller Z; Barr S; Hadden K; Oliphant SS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 30807416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the readability of skin care and pressure ulcer patient education materials.
    Wilson FL; Williams BN
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2003 Jul; 30(4):224-30. PubMed ID: 12851598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of printed sources of diet and health information.
    Dollahite J; Thompson C; McNew R
    Patient Educ Couns; 1996 Mar; 27(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 8788342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of breastfeeding promotion literature: does it really promote breastfeeding?
    Valaitis RK; Shea E
    Can J Public Health; 1993; 84(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 8500052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.