These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10945794)

  • 1. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs.
    Davies PR; Turkson PK; Funk JA; Nichols MA; Ladely SR; Fedorka-Cray PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 89(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 10945794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces.
    Hoorfar J; Mortensen AV
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Nov; 61(11):1426-9. PubMed ID: 11108192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enrichment for isolating Salmonella Choleraesuis and other Salmonella spp. from pigs.
    Osumi T; Asai T; Namimatsu T; Sato S; Yamamoto K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2003 Aug; 65(8):949-51. PubMed ID: 12951433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in Western Canada using a Bayesian approach.
    Wilkins W; Waldner C; Rajić A; McFall M; Muckle A; Mainar-Jaime RC
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Nov; 57 Suppl 1():115-20. PubMed ID: 21083825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity and specificity of different methods for the isolation of Salmonella from pigs.
    Bager F; Petersen J
    Acta Vet Scand; 1991; 32(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 1818506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Salmonellas in Danish pigs: a comparison of three isolation methods.
    Skovgaard N; Christensen SG; Gulistani AW
    J Hyg (Lond); 1985 Aug; 95(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 3894510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis.
    Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry.
    Hoorfar J; Baggesen DL
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1998 Dec; 169(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 9851043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Selective Enrichment Storage Temperature and Duration Time on the Detection of Salmonella in Food.
    Hu L; Zhang G
    J AOAC Int; 2024 May; 107(3):471-478. PubMed ID: 38407384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis.
    Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved isolation of salmonellae from faeces using a semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium.
    Aspinall ST; Hindle MA; Hutchinson DN
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Oct; 11(10):936-9. PubMed ID: 1336727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparison of methods for the enrichment of Salmonellae from human feces].
    Müller HE
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Nov; 253(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 6762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.
    Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces.
    Voogt N; Raes M; Wannet WJ; Henken AM; van de Giessen AW
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2001 Feb; 32(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 11169049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.
    Feder I; Nietfeld JC; Galland J; Yeary T; Sargeant JM; Oberst R; Tamplin ML; Luchansky JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2477-84. PubMed ID: 11427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine.
    Sibley J; Yue B; Huang F; Harding J; Kingdon J; Chirino-Trejo M; Appleyard GD
    Can J Vet Res; 2003 Jul; 67(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 12889729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addition of Novobiocin in pre-enrichment step can improve Salmonella culture protocol of modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis.
    Jensen AN; Sørensen G; Baggesen DL; Bødker R; Hoorfar J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Oct; 55(1):249-55. PubMed ID: 14500016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of GN Hajna and tetrathionate as initial enrichment for salmonellae recovery from swine lymph nodes and cecal contents collected at slaughter.
    Harvey RB; Anderson RC; Farrington LA; Droleskey RE; Genovese KJ; Ziprin RL; Nisbet DJ
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2001 May; 13(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 11482607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the 1-2 test for detecting Salmonella in swine feces.
    Erdman MM; Harris DL
    J Food Prot; 2003 Mar; 66(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 12636313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of classical isolation protocols with a 24 h screen to detect viable salmonellas in faeces.
    Cherrington CA; Huis in't Veld JH
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1993 Jul; 75(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8365957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.