BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10945903)

  • 1. Use of computer-assisted rescreening as an ancillary tool to subclassify AGUS cervical smears.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert PA; Xiong Y; Cangiarella JF; Cohen JM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Sep; 23(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 10945903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
    Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11241259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can glandular lesions be diagnosed in pap smear cytology?
    Raab SS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Aug; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 10888760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytohistologic correlation between AGUS and biopsy-detected lesions in postmenopausal women.
    Obenson K; Abreo F; Grafton WD
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10667158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ; Tellado M; Buckner SB; Ali IS; Stevens A; Ollayos CW
    JAMA; 1998 Jan; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in conventional cervical/vaginal smears and thin-layer preparations.
    Hecht JL; Sheets EE; Lee KR
    Cancer; 2002 Feb; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11836696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. A follow-up study from an academic medical center.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert PA; Cangiarella JF; Cohen JM
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 10934949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): clinical considerations and cytohistologic correlation.
    Nasuti JF; Fleisher SR; Gupta PK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Mar; 26(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 11892026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ; Valente PT
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid rescreening of cervical smears for internal quality control.
    Diehl AR; Prolla JC
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(4):949-53. PubMed ID: 9684583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification.
    Tam KF; Cheung AN; Liu KL; Ng TY; Pun TC; Chan YM; Wong LC; Ng AW; Ngan HY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 14675684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
    Al-Rayyan E; Rashed M; Maaita M; Qudah S; Taso O; Haddadin W
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up.
    Soofer SB; Sidawy MK
    Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 10966560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Subtyping as a predictor of outcome.
    Reuss E; Price J; Koonings P
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 11547641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical implications of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, favor endometrial origin.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
    Cancer; 2001 Dec; 93(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 11748574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histologic follow-up of atypical endocervical cells. Liquid-based, thin-layer preparation vs. conventional Pap smear.
    Wang N; Emancipator SN; Rose P; Rodriguez M; Abdul-Karim FW
    Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 12040636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.