These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946096)
21. Dynamic in vivo 3D atlantoaxial spine kinematics during upright rotation. Anderst W; Rynearson B; West T; Donaldson W; Lee J J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 60():110-115. PubMed ID: 28662932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Viscoelasticity of the alar and transverse ligaments. Möller J; Nolte LP; Visarius H; Willburger R; Crisco JJ; Panjabi MM Eur Spine J; 1992 Dec; 1(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 20054935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Differences Among Kinematic Parameters for Evaluating the Quality of Intervertebral Motion of the Cervical Spine in Clinical and Experimental Studies: Concepts, Research and Measurement Techniques. A Literature Review. Sang D; Cui W; Guo Z; Sang H; Liu B World Neurosurg; 2020 Jan; 133():343-357.e1. PubMed ID: 31550538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal axial rotation. Salem W; Lenders C; Mathieu J; Hermanus N; Klein P Man Ther; 2013 Aug; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23375147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A model of the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine in axial rotation. Crisco JJ; Panjabi MM; Dvorak J J Biomech; 1991; 24(7):607-14. PubMed ID: 1880144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intended and non-intended kinematic effects of atlanto-axial rotational high-velocity, low-amplitude techniques. Cattrysse E; Gianola S; Provyn S; Van Roy P Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 25556040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional motion of the uncovertebral joint during head rotation. Nagamoto Y; Ishii T; Iwasaki M; Sakaura H; Moritomo H; Fujimori T; Kashii M; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 22860876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The accuracy of the Oculus Rift virtual reality head-mounted display during cervical spine mobility measurement. Xu X; Chen KB; Lin JH; Radwin RG J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(4):721-724. PubMed ID: 25636855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anatomy and biomechanics of normal craniovertebral junction (a) and biomechanics of stabilization (b). Menezes AH; Traynelis VC Childs Nerv Syst; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1091-100. PubMed ID: 18389261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and validation of a finite element model of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex under physiologic loads. Zhang H; Bai J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):968-74. PubMed ID: 17450071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Normal kinematics of the upper cervical spine during the Flexion-Rotation Test - In vivo measurements using magnetic resonance imaging. Takasaki H; Hall T; Oshiro S; Kaneko S; Ikemoto Y; Jull G Man Ther; 2011 Apr; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 21055995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional dynamic in vivo motion of the cervical spine: assessment of measurement accuracy and preliminary findings. McDonald CP; Bachison CC; Chang V; Bartol SW; Bey MJ Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 20359957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Anatomy and biomechanics of the craniovertebral junction. Lopez AJ; Scheer JK; Leibl KE; Smith ZA; Dlouhy BJ; Dahdaleh NS Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Apr; 38(4):E2. PubMed ID: 25828496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion. Greaves LL; Van Toen C; Melnyk A; Koenig L; Zhu Q; Tredwell S; Mulpuri K; Cripton PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1650-7. PubMed ID: 19770607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incorporating ligament laxity in a finite element model for the upper cervical spine. Lasswell TL; Cronin DS; Medley JB; Rasoulinejad P Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1755-1764. PubMed ID: 28673824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of two measurement techniques of cervical spine and C1-C2 rotation in the outcome research of axis fractures: a morphometrical analysis using dynamic computed tomography scanning. Koller H; Resch H; Acosta F; Zenner J; Schwaiger R; Tauber M; Forstner R; Lederer S; Auffarth A; Hitzl W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 20075766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Global and regional kinematics of the cervical spine during upper cervical spine manipulation: a reliability analysis of 3D motion data. Dugailly PM; Beyer B; Sobczak S; Salvia P; Feipel V Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 24920337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A method to simulate in vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Miura T; Panjabi MM; Cripton PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11805634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]