These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946098)

  • 1. Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography-based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics.
    Dvir Z; Prushansky T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Nov; 15(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 10946098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects.
    Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B
    Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of cervical range of motion pattern during cyclic neck movement by an ultrasound-based motion system.
    Wang SF; Teng CC; Lin KH
    Man Ther; 2005 Feb; 10(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 15681271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
    Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility.
    Guidetti L; Placentino U; Baldari C
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1359-E1366. PubMed ID: 26905732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study.
    Feipel V; Rondelet B; Le Pallec J; Rooze M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 1999 Aug; 14(7):462-70. PubMed ID: 10521629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
    Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
    Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximal versus feigned active cervical motion in healthy patients: the coefficient of variation as an indicator for sincerity of effort.
    Dvir Z; Prushansky T; Peretz C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1680-8. PubMed ID: 11474355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [IN VIVO THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRANSIENT MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS].
    Li H; Xia Q; Bai J; Miao J; Liu J; Wei D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1494-9. PubMed ID: 27044217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of measuring half-cycle cervical range of motion may be increased using a spirit level for calibration.
    Wilke J; Niederer D; Vogt L; Banzer W
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2018 Feb; 33():99-104. PubMed ID: 28869199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
    Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
    Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults.
    Frobin W; Leivseth G; Biggemann M; Brinckmann P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2002 Jan; 17(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11779643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies.
    Niewiadomski C; Bianco RJ; Afquir S; Evin M; Arnoux PJ
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():9. PubMed ID: 30680090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sagittal alignment of cervical flexion and extension: lateral radiographic analysis.
    Takeshima T; Omokawa S; Takaoka T; Araki M; Ueda Y; Takakura Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug; 27(15):E348-55. PubMed ID: 12163735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
    Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
    J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion.
    Quek J; Brauer SG; Treleaven J; Pua YH; Mentiplay B; Clark RA
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 11():65. PubMed ID: 24742001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion.
    Lantz CA; Chen J; Buch D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1082-9. PubMed ID: 10361657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation.
    Lee JH; Kim JS; Lee JH; Chung ER; Shim CS; Lee SH
    Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1199-204. PubMed ID: 24183464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.