These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946344)

  • 1. Effectiveness of two devices designed to prevent fluid retraction in a high-speed handpiece.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 10946344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of preventive effects of two kinds of dental handpieces on viral contamination at different rotating times].
    Hu T; Zuo YL; Zhou XD
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 22(4):293-4, 297. PubMed ID: 15379309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of microbial contamination of the dental unit caused by suction into the turbine drive air lines.
    Ojajärvi J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jan; 81(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 8850483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contamination of the turbine air chamber: a risk of cross infection.
    Checchi L; Montebugnoli L; Samaritani S
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 25(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 9722263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbiological evaluation of a newly designed dental air-turbine handpiece for anti-cross contaminations.
    Ohsuka S; Ohta M; Masuda K; Kaneda T; Ueda M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 7916884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevention of infection in dental procedures.
    Matsuyama M; Usami T; Masuda K; Niimi N; Ohta M; Ueda M
    J Hosp Infect; 1997 Jan; 35(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 9032632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure of anti-retraction valves and the procedure for between patient flushing: a rationale for chemical control of dental unit waterline contamination.
    Montebugnoli L; Dolci G; Spratt DA; Puttaiah R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 16296436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces.
    Choi C; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 20141814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discharge of lubricant from air turbine handpieces.
    Pong AS; Dyson JE; Darvell BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 May; 198(10):637-40; discussion 627; quiz 648. PubMed ID: 15920598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of anti-retraction devices in preventing bacterial contamination of dental unit water lines.
    Berlutti F; Testarelli L; Vaia F; De Luca M; Dolci G
    J Dent; 2003 Feb; 31(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 12654549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatter contamination in dental practices--how can it be prevented?
    Graetz C; Bielfeldt J; Tillner A; Plaumann A; Dörfer CE
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(4):1122-34. PubMed ID: 25581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness evaluation of different suction systems.
    Junevicius J; Surna A; Surna R
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 16254467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handpiece sterilization: is it really necessary?
    Young JM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 24(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 9063183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of 10 different rotary cutting instruments. Part I: Turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):248-61. PubMed ID: 19328278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The magnitude of cutting forces at high speed.
    Elias K; Amis AA; Setchell DJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 12644805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical method to determine the effectiveness of dental handpiece sterilization.
    Cox MR; Carpenter RD; Goodman HS
    MSDA J; 1993; 36(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9552622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Keys to successful handpiece maintenance.
    Young JM
    Tex Dent J; 1997 Dec; 114(12):15-9. PubMed ID: 9518812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures.
    Toroğlu MS; Haytaç MC; Köksal F
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Aug; 71(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 11510639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Air-Driven Dental Unit: Form and Function at a Mechanical Level.
    Pegg JE; Lothamer C; Rawlinson JE
    J Vet Dent; 2019 Sep; 36(3):202-208. PubMed ID: 31928396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.