299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946346)
1. Modified custom tray.
Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
Cain JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Al-Athel MS
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.
Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin.
Castellani D; Basile M
J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions.
Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct pressure provisionalization technique: a new open-tray technique for complete-arch rehabilitations.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Feb; 31(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 11203918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures.
Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensional stability of autopolymerizing acrylic resin impression trays.
Fehling AW; Hesby RA; Pelleu GB
J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 3519946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fabrication of a custom impression tray using a thermoplastic material as the tray spacer.
Barrero C; Purdy M
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 16198183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays.
Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
