93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946378)
1. The category access measure of relational processing.
Burns DJ; Brown CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10946378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
Cousins R; Hanley JR
Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Item and relational processing in young and older adults.
Fisher LM; McDowd JM
J Gerontol; 1993 Mar; 48(2):P62-8. PubMed ID: 8473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
Burns DJ; Gold DE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
Burns DJ; Hebert T
Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias.
Otani H; Whiteman HL
Am J Psychol; 1994; 107(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 7977903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.
Hodge MH; Otani H
Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8822163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relational and item-specific information as determinants of category superiority effects.
Sharps MJ; Wilson-Leff CA; Price JL
J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):271-85. PubMed ID: 7650521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
von Essen JD
Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
Massaro DW
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of contextual constraints on recall for words within sentences.
McFalls EL; Schwanenflugel PJ
Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 11868195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relational verbal memory processing in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.
Helmstaedter C; Gleissner U; Di Perna M; Elger CE
Cortex; 1997 Dec; 33(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 9444468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for time-based models of free recall.
Brown GD; Morin C; Lewandowsky S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 17201375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why consumers misattribute sponsorships to non-sponsor brands: Differential roles of item and relational communications.
Weeks CS; Humphreys MS; Cornwell TB
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Jun; 24(2):125-144. PubMed ID: 29389163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
Mulligan NW
Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
