These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946378)

  • 21. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 16156173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gains and losses in action memory.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recall order determines the magnitude of directed forgetting in the within-participants list method.
    Golding JM; Gottlob LR
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jun; 33(4):588-94. PubMed ID: 16248324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Beginning at the beginning: Recall order and the number of words to be recalled.
    Tan L; Ward G; Paulauskaite L; Markou M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1282-92. PubMed ID: 26844583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall.
    LeCompte DC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Nov; 20(6):1396-408. PubMed ID: 7983471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The recall of missing items.
    Murdock B; Smith D
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 16156174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Concreteness effects in free recall: the roles of imaginal and relational processing.
    Marschark M; Surian L
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 1435264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall.
    Burns DJ; Curti ET; Lavin JC
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Nov; 21(6):846-52. PubMed ID: 8289662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative testing effect.
    Rawson KA; Wissman KT; Vaughn KE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1326-36. PubMed ID: 25961357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex, age, and sex hormones affect recall of words in a directed forgetting paradigm.
    Kerschbaum HH; Hofbauer I; Gföllner A; Ebner B; Bresgen N; Bäuml KT
    J Neurosci Res; 2017 Jan; 95(1-2):251-259. PubMed ID: 27870411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relational and item-specific information in the determination of "blocking effects".
    Sharps MJ; Tindall MH
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Mar; 20(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 1565016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
    Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Associative relatedness enhances recall and produces false memories in immediate serial recall.
    Tehan G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Dec; 64(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21186910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.