BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946537)

  • 1. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Win some, lose some: hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing.
    Olofsson U
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 9421565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gains and losses in action memory.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1067-87. PubMed ID: 8805816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
    Burns DJ; Gold DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generation and hypermnesia.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):436-50. PubMed ID: 11294442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The attentional boost effect enhances the item-specific, but not the relational, encoding of verbal material: Evidence from multiple recall tests with related and unrelated lists.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Cestari V; Santirocchi A; Saraulli D; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1083-1097. PubMed ID: 33818117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing.
    Hirshman E; Mulligan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 May; 17(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 1829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.
    Hodge MH; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
    Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fewer generation constraints increase the generation effect for item and source memory through enhanced relational processing.
    McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Leshikar ED
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):598-616. PubMed ID: 32292105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
    Burns DJ; Hebert T
    Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
    Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.