These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946537)

  • 1. Perceptual interference at encoding enhances item-specific encoding and disrupts relational encoding: evidence from multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 10946537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The emergence of item-specific encoding effects in between-subjects designs: perceptual interference and multiple recall tests.
    Mulligan NW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 12120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on organization and order: investigating the roles of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jan; 25(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 9949708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Win some, lose some: hypermnesia for actions reflects increased item-specific processing.
    Olofsson U
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Nov; 25(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 9421565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gains and losses in action memory.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):829-48. PubMed ID: 12850992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of perceptual interference at encoding on implicit memory, explicit memory, and memory for source.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1067-87. PubMed ID: 8805816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.
    Burns DJ; Gold DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1999 Jul; 25(4):978-85. PubMed ID: 10439504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generation and hypermnesia.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):436-50. PubMed ID: 11294442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The attentional boost effect enhances the item-specific, but not the relational, encoding of verbal material: Evidence from multiple recall tests with related and unrelated lists.
    Spataro P; Mulligan NW; Cestari V; Santirocchi A; Saraulli D; Rossi-Arnaud C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1083-1097. PubMed ID: 33818117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual interference improves explicit memory but does not enhance data-driven processing.
    Hirshman E; Mulligan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 May; 17(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 1829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.
    Hodge MH; Otani H
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 8822163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.
    Engelkamp J; Seiler KH; Zimmer HD
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 14691724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory in pregnancy and post-partum: Item specific and relational encoding processes in recall and recognition.
    Spataro P; Saraulli D; Oriolo D; Costanzi M; Zanetti H; Cestari V; Rossi-Arnaud C
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 57(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 27197632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory.
    von Essen JD
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Aug; 46(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 16014075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fewer generation constraints increase the generation effect for item and source memory through enhanced relational processing.
    McCurdy MP; Sklenar AM; Frankenstein AN; Leshikar ED
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):598-616. PubMed ID: 32292105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using cumulative-recall curves to assess the extent of relational and item-specific processing.
    Burns DJ; Hebert T
    Memory; 2005 Feb; 13(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15847230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
    Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.