156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946537)
21. The effect of environmental context on recall and category clustering scores following relational and individual item processing: a test of the outshining hypothesis.
Cousins R; Hanley JR
Memory; 1996 Jan; 4(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 8821087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relational and item-specific information in the determination of "blocking effects".
Sharps MJ; Tindall MH
Mem Cognit; 1992 Mar; 20(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 1565016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Event-related potentials during encoding: Comparing unitization to relational processing.
Tu HW; Alty EE; Diana RA
Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 1667():46-54. PubMed ID: 28495307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: a relational/item-specific account.
McDaniel MA; Moore BA; Whiteman HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Jan; 24(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 9438958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order.
Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 25329084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.
Soraci SA; Franks JJ; Bransford JD; Chechile RA; Belli RF; Carr M; Carlin M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 8138789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
Huff MJ; Aschenbrenner AJ
Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hypermnesia for prose.
Otani H; Griffith JD
J Gen Psychol; 1998 Apr; 125(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 9778837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall.
Klein SB; Loftus J; Kihlstrom JF; Aseron R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1192-7. PubMed ID: 2530312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. When does generation enhance memory for location?
Marsh EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1216-20. PubMed ID: 16938059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.
Jonker TR; Wammes JD; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):689-699. PubMed ID: 30211591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall.
Staresina BP; Davachi L
J Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 26(36):9162-72. PubMed ID: 16957073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.
Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):859-71. PubMed ID: 25181496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relational and item-specific influences on generate-recognize processes in recall.
Guynn MJ; McDaniel MA; Strosser GL; Ramirez JM; Castleberry EH; Arnett KH
Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):198-211. PubMed ID: 24425424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information.
Gronlund SD; Edwards MB; Ohrt DD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1997 Sep; 23(5):1261-74. PubMed ID: 9293634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Two are not better than one: Combining unitization and relational encoding strategies.
Tu HW; Diana RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):114-26. PubMed ID: 26237616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hippocampal contributions to episodic encoding: insights from relational and item-based learning.
Davachi L; Wagner AD
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Aug; 88(2):982-90. PubMed ID: 12163547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
