These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946548)

  • 1. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: when does relatedness matter?
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Lupker SJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):180-96. PubMed ID: 20873915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 21287120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. At-lexical, articulatory interference in silent reading: the "upstream" tongue-twister effect.
    Robinson DH; Katayama AD
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):661-5. PubMed ID: 9337584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context and lexical access: implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Burgess C; Tanenhaus MK; Seidenberg MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):620-32. PubMed ID: 2526855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attentional control of lexical processing pathways: reversing the word frequency effect.
    Balota DA; Law MB; Zevin JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1081-9. PubMed ID: 11126932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.
    Rayner K; Frazier L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 2528602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context effects in word recognition: evidence for early interactive processing.
    Sereno SC; Brewer CC; O'Donnell PJ
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jul; 14(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 12807405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.
    Perea M; Carreiras M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1090-102. PubMed ID: 15813492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM; Pittman DJ; Goodyear BG
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 20382629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Privileged access to action for objects relative to words.
    Chainay H; Humphreys GW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):348-55. PubMed ID: 12120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.