148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946719)
1. A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.
McCann RS; Remington RW; Van Selst M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1352-70. PubMed ID: 10946719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age.
Lien MC; Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Grabbe J; McCann RS; Remington RW
Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):431-47. PubMed ID: 16953708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: a dual-task investigation.
Dent K; Johnston RA; Humphreys GW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):282-301. PubMed ID: 18315406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.
Reynolds M; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1303-23. PubMed ID: 17154774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
Mathey S
Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Behavioral and neurobiological effects of printed word repetition in lexical decision and naming.
Katz L; Lee CH; Tabor W; Frost SJ; Mencl WE; Sandak R; Rueckl J; Pugh KR
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2068-83. PubMed ID: 16243052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.
Marí-Beffa P; Valdés B; Cullen DJ; Catena A; Houghton G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
Hein G; Schubert T
Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
Roelofs A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of lexical competition and acoustic-phonetic structure in lexical processing: evidence from normal subjects and aphasic patients.
Misiurski C; Blumstein SE; Rissman J; Berman D
Brain Lang; 2005 Apr; 93(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 15766769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention.
Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Cornett L; Goodin Z; Allen PA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):751-73. PubMed ID: 18505335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
