These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946719)

  • 41. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Word substitution errors in a speeded picture-word task.
    Starreveld PA; La Heij Wx
    Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(4):521-53. PubMed ID: 10696265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
    Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies.
    Cleland AA; Gaskell MG; Quinlan PT; Tamminen J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):104-19. PubMed ID: 16478330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?
    van den Boer M; de Jong PF; Haentjens-van Meeteren MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1214-28. PubMed ID: 22489669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Localizing semantic interference from distractor sounds in picture naming: A dual-task study.
    Mädebach A; Kieseler ML; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1909-1916. PubMed ID: 29030759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Word-stem tones cue suffixes in the brain.
    Roll M; Söderström P; Horne M
    Brain Res; 2013 Jul; 1520():116-20. PubMed ID: 23685193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions.
    Kunde W; Landgraf F; Paelecke M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Feb; 18(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 17425526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A controlled comparison of the word repeating technique with a word association task.
    De Young KP; Lavender JM; Washington LA; Looby A; Anderson DA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2010 Dec; 41(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 20519128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.
    Stolz JA; McCann RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1320-31. PubMed ID: 10946717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Fischer R; Schubert T
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 18549168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Differences between young and old university students on a lexical decision task: evidence through an ex-Gaussian approach.
    Navarro-Pardo E; Navarro-Prados AB; Gamermann D; Moret-Tatay C
    J Gen Psychol; 2013; 140(4):251-68. PubMed ID: 24837819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.