These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Selective attention and performance with a multidimensional visual display. Lambert A; Hockey R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Nov; 12(4):484-95. PubMed ID: 2946805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention. Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Inhibition of return and action affordances. Morgan HM; Tipper SP Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 16491408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Cheal ML; Gregory M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Feb; 23(1):51-71. PubMed ID: 9157188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory. Li Q; Saiki J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Tipper SP; Driver J; Weaver B Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 May; 43(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 1866461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Precuing benefits for color and location in a visual search task. Vierck E; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 18372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing. Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jul; 69(5):719-31. PubMed ID: 17929695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Tipper SP; Jordan H; Weaver B Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 10070199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation. Wühr P J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task. Kim MS; Cave KR Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(5):611-24. PubMed ID: 11226506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Spatial attention can be biased towards an expected dimension. Burnett KE; Close AC; d'Avossa G; Sapir A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2218-32. PubMed ID: 27033515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Attentional spreading in object-based attention: the roles of target-object integration and target presentation time. Zhao J; Kong F; Wang Y Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):876-87. PubMed ID: 23460296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]