These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946721)
61. The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: perceptual load versus feature-based attention. Taya S; Adams WJ; Graf EW; Lavie N J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):12.1-10. PubMed ID: 20053103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention. Yeari M; Goldsmith M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):565-579. PubMed ID: 20515189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The spatial distribution of attention within and across objects. Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):135-51. PubMed ID: 21728455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. How to Create Objects With Your Mind: From Object-Based Attention to Attention-Based Objects. Ongchoco JDK; Scholl BJ Psychol Sci; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 31634050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Infants' use of motion cues in object individuation processes. Decarli G; Franchin L; Piazza M; Surian L J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104868. PubMed ID: 32473381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects. Szinte M; Jonikaitis D; Rolfs M; Cavanagh P; Deubel H J Neurophysiol; 2016 Oct; 116(4):1592-1602. PubMed ID: 27385792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory. Souza AS; Thalmann M; Oberauer K Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 29687399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Effects of spatial congruency on saccade and visual discrimination performance in a dual-task paradigm. Moehler T; Fiehler K Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():100-11. PubMed ID: 25449339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Object-based control of attention is sensitive to recent experience. Lee H; Mozer MC; Kramer AF; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):314-25. PubMed ID: 21967274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention. Şentürk G; Greenberg AS; Liu T Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1998-2013. PubMed ID: 27225468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Implicit relational learning in a multiple-object tracking task. Lazareva OF; McInnerney J; Williams T Behav Processes; 2018 Jul; 152():26-36. PubMed ID: 29689336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Object-based selection in the two-rectangles method is not an artifact of the three-sided directional cue. Marrara MT; Moore CM Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1103-9. PubMed ID: 14674636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]