These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946916)

  • 1. The time-course of the effects of contralateral sound on the level of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Sasaki N; Kawase T; Ogura M; Takasaka T
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2000 Jun; 191(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10946916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
    Sun XM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term sound conditioning increases distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes and decreases olivocochlear efferent reflex strength.
    Peng JH; Tao ZZ; Huang ZW
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1167-70. PubMed ID: 17589320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Recognition of speech in noise and relations with suppression of otoacoustic emissions and the acoustic reflex].
    Lautenschlager L; Tochetto T; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21340199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Could the Use of Acoustic Reflexes Prior to Administering Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) Affect the Results of DPOAEs?
    Garrette R; Jones AL; Wilson MW
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):349-353. PubMed ID: 29800116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression findings in children with Asperger's Syndrome.
    Kaf WA; Danesh AA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 77(6):947-54. PubMed ID: 23562236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustically and electrically evoked contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs.
    Popelár J; Valvoda J; Syka J
    Hear Res; 1999 Sep; 135(1-2):61-70. PubMed ID: 10491955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nicotinic-like receptor mediates suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by contralateral sound.
    Kujawa SG; Glattke TJ; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
    Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 74(1-2):122-34. PubMed ID: 8040083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
    Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contralateral-noise effects on cochlear responses in anesthetized mice are dominated by feedback from an unknown pathway.
    Maison SF; Usubuchi H; Vetter DE; Elgoyhen AB; Thomas SA; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jul; 108(2):491-500. PubMed ID: 22514298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability.
    Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Nov; 92(5):2662-82. PubMed ID: 1479129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
    Lisowska G; Smurzynski J; Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Probst R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.