These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946926)
1. Evaluation and comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction with bilateral breast reduction using the inferior pedicle and McKissock's vertical bipedicle dermal flap techniques. Ramon Y; Sharony Z; Moscona RA; Ullmann Y; Peled IJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Aug; 106(2):289-95; discussion 295-7. PubMed ID: 10946926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dermal suspension flaps for McKissock's vertical bipedicle flap vs. classical McKissock's technique: comparison of aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Menderes A; Mola F; Vayvada H; Yilmaz M; Baytekin C Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 58(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 15710116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reduction mammaplasty according to McKissock's technique. A review of 312 cases]. Fogli A Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1993 Apr; 38(2):198-205; discussion 206. PubMed ID: 8304742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Superomedial Pedicle Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Breast Symmetry and Aesthetics. Ron O; Inbal A; Arad E; Zaretski A; Leshem D; Yanko R; Gur E; Barnea Y Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 42(3):639-647. PubMed ID: 29218474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Does Reduction Mammaplasty Surgical Technique Impact Clinical, Aesthetic, and Patient-Reported Outcomes?: A Comparison of the Superomedial and Inferior Pedicle Techniques. Cunning JR; Mookerjee VG; Alper DP; Rios-Diaz AJ; Bauder AR; Kimia R; Broach RB; Barrette LX; Fischer JP; Butler PD Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jul; 91(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 37450858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Different techniques of reduction mammaplasty comparing clinical and esthetic complications with patient satisfaction]. Stranz G; Petri E Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 10522376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast reduction: personal technique. Fino P; Di Taranto G; Toscani M; Scuderi N Clin Ter; 2016; 167(6):e167-e170. PubMed ID: 28051831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications After Reduction Mammaplasty: A Comparison of Wise Pattern/Inferior Pedicle and Vertical Scar/Superomedial Pedicle. Ogunleye AA; Leroux O; Morrison N; Preminger AB Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 79(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 28328638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The "Superior Ledge": a Modification of the Standard Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty to Accentuate Nipple-Areola Complex Projection. Henderson PW; Chang MM; Taylor EM; Weinreb R; Rohde CH Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):733-8. PubMed ID: 27506647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "dermal cage": a modification of the inferior pedicle breast reduction. Zic R; Vlajcic Z; Dewing D; Zambelli M; Stanec Z Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 23358579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients. Moran SL; Nava G; Behnam AB; Serletti JM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1876-82. PubMed ID: 12711947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Central Pedicle Reduction in Gigantomastia Without Free Nipple Graft. Karacor-Altuntas Z; Dadaci M; Ince B; Karamese M; Savaci N Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Apr; 76(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 26954750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction mammaplasty using the free-nipple-graft vertical technique for severe breast hypertrophy: improved outcomes with the superior dermaglandular flap. Karsidag S; Akcal A; Karsidag T; Yesiloglu N; Yesilada AK; Ugurlu K Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):254-61. PubMed ID: 20931192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Kim M; Davis JA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 11007387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. McKissock's Reduction Mammaplasty Revisited: A Case Series Study with 12-months Follow-up. Abozeid MF; Tahseen H; Kenawi I Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2018 Jun; 6(6):e1791. PubMed ID: 30276040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Outcomes of Inferior Pedicle and Superomedial Pedicle Technique With Wise Pattern Reduction in Gigantomastic Patients. Kemaloğlu CA; Özocak H Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Mar; 80(3):217-222. PubMed ID: 28984653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Edsander-Nord A ; Brandberg Y; Wickman M Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Apr; 107(5):1142-53; discussion 1154-5. PubMed ID: 11373553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Formula for Planning and Predicting Postoperative Mammoplasty Results. Smithson MG; Collawn SS; Mousa MS; Bramel CM Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 78(6S Suppl 5):S343-S346. PubMed ID: 28328641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of the opposite breast in patients with a breast reconstructed with an implant: validity of the inverted "T", superior pedicle technique, with an inferiorly-based dermal adipose flap. Persichetti P; Simone P; Palazzolo D; Carusi C J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2012 Oct; 46(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 22931134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]