These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10946961)

  • 1. Current trends in breast reduction.
    Linderman R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Aug; 106(2):512. PubMed ID: 10946961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction mammaplasty-the schnur sliding scale revisited.
    Schnur PL
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Jan; 42(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 9972729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current trends in breast reduction.
    Roje Z; Roje Z; Milosević M; Varvodić J; Mance M
    Coll Antropol; 2012 Jun; 36(2):657-68. PubMed ID: 22856260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reason for lack of acceptance of radical breast reduction.
    Linderman R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2629-30. PubMed ID: 10845328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective analysis of insurance-based reduction mammaplasties: long-term trends for subsequent cosmetic procedures.
    Barbour JR; Sher SR; Iorio ML
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):322e-323e. PubMed ID: 23897369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reduction mammaplasty trends: a quality and fiscal analysis update.
    Blaine CM; Subbio CR; Eid SM; Murphy RX
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):344-6. PubMed ID: 22868311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in Lumpectomy and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in the US, 2011-2016.
    Kimball CC; Nichols CI; Vose JG; Peled AW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(13):3867-3873. PubMed ID: 30242775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002.
    Rohrich RJ; Gosman AA; Brown SA; Tonadapu P; Foster B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Dec; 114(7):1724-33; discussion 1734-6. PubMed ID: 15577341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cost analysis of conservative versus operative therapy of macromastia].
    Scholz T; Diedrichson J; Olbrisch RR; Liebau J
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2008 Apr; 40(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 18437668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vertical Sculpted Pillar Reduction Mammaplasty in 317 Patients: Technique, Complications, and BREAST-Q Outcomes.
    Derby BM; Grotting JC; Redden DT
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):417-30. PubMed ID: 26906351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communication--making the human connection.
    Giroux J
    Urol Nurs; 2013; 33(6):265. PubMed ID: 24592518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolving Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Is the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Taking Over?
    Pien I; Caccavale S; Cheung MC; Butala P; Hughes DB; Ligh C; Zenn MR; Hollenbeck ST
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25180959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An international comparison of reimbursement for DIEAP flap breast reconstruction.
    Reid AW; Szpalski C; Sheppard NN; Morrison CM; Blondeel PN
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1529-35. PubMed ID: 26272008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prescription benefit design: perspectives, reimbursement issues, and future trends.
    Owens G; Balfour D; Cohen J; Cohen S; Jacobs M; Lease M; Ratnesar R; Schaecher KL; Wilcox DE
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Oct; 10(13 Suppl):S420-3. PubMed ID: 15622873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
    Gurunluoglu R; Gurunluoglu A; Williams SA; Tebockhorst S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 21862916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-utility of reduction mammaplasty assessed for the Brazilian public health system.
    Araújo CD; Veiga DF; Hochman BS; Abla LE; Oliveira AC; Novo NF; Veiga-Filho J; Ferreira LM
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Nov; 34(8):1198-204. PubMed ID: 24973340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
    Serletti JM; Moran SL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction.
    Hayhurst JW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1770-1. PubMed ID: 9774055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The complex insurance reimbursement landscape in reduction mammaplasty: how does the American plastic surgeon navigate it?
    Frey JD; Koltz PF; Bell DE; Langstein HN
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 24346219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A European comparison of reimbursement in breast reconstruction.
    Lotter O; Stahl S; Schiefer JL; Townley WA; Schaller HE; Jaminet P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 39(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 23313013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.